Guys this 10,000 hours thing is really misunderstood and misquoted.
Its comes from work in the 90s by mostly Dr. K. Anders Ericsson and some others.
Its not 10,000 "doing". Ericsson found that the difference between expert performers and the good performers was that the so call experts or the one recognised as be at the top of their field had engaged in deliberate practice of at least 10,000 hours.
Just doing does not make you an expert. To take techs example how many apprenticeship become true masters? Close to none but most have logged 10,000 by their 4 -5 year. They become competent but not top of their field.
The 10,000 hours thing is now quoted as 10,000 hours to success. this is exactly the opposite to what the studies, and there is a heap of them, was proving. Lots of people clock up 10,000 hours doing. Few become masters in their field.
Average apprenticeship 3 yrs 6240 hrs
Average Degree 3 yrs 6240 hrs
Masters 8320 hrs
Doctorate 14560 hrs
Most race drivers start in carts at 7 and end up racing at 18 ish.
So say 11 yrs at 10 hrs a week 5720 hrs.
Most pro golfers would have spent 10,000 hrs + playing golf.
Most businesses fail in the first 3 yrs 6240 hrs.
Most traders in the same time frame.
10,000 hrs is a good "Average" for consistent understanding of a discipline I think.
Just as 95% of traders fail is a good "Average".
ok, so us newbies are told-
--->10,000 hours to become a good trader.
--> KISS, keep it simple stupid.
takes 10,000 hours to keep it simple?
ok, so us newbies are told-
--->10,000 hours to become a good trader.
--> KISS, keep it simple stupid.
takes 10,000 hours to keep it simple?
I've probably put in 160,000 and I'm still crap.
Kennas that reads funny.I've probably put in 160,000 and I'm still crap.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.