- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,071
- Reactions
- 12,648
What about Tony Abbott ?
He couldn't run a hot dog stand !
Dunno, reaction on Twitter was pretty negative. The vast majority of my clients (95% women, mostly left leaning) have been polemical about it. Not all support Leyonhjelm's actions mind you, but only one actually supported SHY. That's a pretty good "pub test" imo.I don't know the context or who threw the first barb but Leyonhjelm's comment was a low blow. Involving the public is a masterstroke because most will sympathise with the female, right or wrong.
The whole thing has been blown out of proportion, mostly by SHY herself.
It's just the rough and tumble of politics.
If Lleyonhjhelme (I'll never spell that right) was a gentleman he would apologise, but he's not so making a fuss about it is just giving him more publicity.
For all of Sarah demands she be treated equal to men, she takes umbrage when she is.
Calling a bloke a "ladies man" might be considered a compliment, I don't see why the reverse shouldn't apply.![]()
Hopefully the Courts take a dim view of her using crowd funding to make sure she doesn't lose a cent, but the person she is taking to Court is fully exposed. Someone link me to David L's funding page please.
P.S. I'm seeking funding for a Melbourne Cup bet. It's 9/1 odds, so I'd appreciate it if you all could cover my potential loses pls.
Haha. Cheers. Jump onboard folks!
I'm just struggling to accept that SHY believes this is an issue for the courts.
Possibly six figures overall for the lawyers over this?
I wonder if the courts will deem that SHY, actually defamed Leyonhjelm, by saying publicly he called her a slut.
That reflects on his character, when he didn't call her that at all. He just suggested she doesn't have intimate relations with men, if she hates them so much.
It will be interesting, I think SHY will be wishing, she had never started this ball rolling.
Your small sample could be right but there is no discounting the possibility that Senator Leyonhjelm had certain desires. The inner knowing of certain defeat may have been too much to bear.Dunno, reaction on Twitter was pretty negative. The vast majority of my clients (95% women, mostly left leaning) have been polemical about it. Not all support Leyonhjelm's actions mind you, but only one actually supported SHY. That's a pretty good "pub test" imo.
It would appear, from this article on ABC's website, that Sarah will have plenty to do in her own Party regarding treating women properly. The accusations sound as serious as David Leyonhjelm's, if not more so.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-02/women-say-greens-botched-sexual-misconduct-complaints/10060954
It is always amazing, how when the ball starts rolling, it gathers speed quickly. It is good, that people can at least now, talk openly about the issues. It wasn't long ago that it was a taboo subject.
Incredibly, the woman took a video after being initially disgusted. Women tend to be more (......) than men and it was an opportunity she couldn't miss. Like who would believe her at the work morning tea table without a go-pro to prove it. Hilarious.It would appear, from this article on ABC's website, that Sarah will have plenty to do in her own Party regarding treating women properly.
Ms Buckland says she went to Mr Buckingham's Newtown home with another woman after Friday night drinks in August 2011.
When they arrived at the house, she says Mr Buckingham served more drinks.
"Quite quickly I realised that something was happening between this woman and Jeremy," Ms Buckland said.
"They were touching each other a lot, it was getting really flirtatious. I was really uncomfortable."
Ms Buckland said she stopped drinking and became so "disgusted" by Mr Buckingham's behaviour that she took a video.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.