- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
You've yet to point what part of the judgement is factually wrong or any errors of law. I assume you are incapable of doing so.
The fish are biteing well today.
Not judgement. Opinions. Opinions are often wrong. As yours are, despite your great legal brain.
Knobby's contribution. Banco's ventriloquist doll.
Yes, good point.
Calliope, show us where you believe the judge erred in his judgement and so on what basis the appeal can take place.
And the third Roxon/Rares luvvie chips with the admission that it's the luck of the draw and the statement that "Slipper is a pretty seedy sort of guy." Well who'd have guessed it.
Yeah, and? Juries are virtually non-existant in civil trials. So pretty much every civil case hinges on one man or woman's decision. I know that you may like to think this is some great travesty of justice, but it's just business as usual.
If he wants to appeal to the full bench, let him. The lawyers will make a packet.
My own opinion: Slipper is a pretty seedy sort of guy, Ashby doesn't seem much better. No wonder he worked for him for so long.