- Joined
- 18 September 2008
- Posts
- 4,041
- Reactions
- 1,185
There are some precedents being set here that are disturbing. For instance, should a man not be allowed enter a swimming pool if there are some children there and no other adults, or perhaps be forced to keep a certain distance from the kids when in the pool. Or even be asked to leave the pool if all other adults have exited.
I do not subscribe to the theory of children's safety above all other considerations, particularly when the potential for adult misbehaviour is low or even if possible, would be of a very minor nature that would perhaps go unnoticed by the child. Such improbable and perhaps insignificant misbehaviour could be far less damaging to the child than the message that child may be learning from the preventative policies. That all men are not to be trusted. That it is ok to humiliate a person just because that person is a man and is trust into a situation not of his choosing. What if the child were at some stage to be interfered with by a female adult and the only other person for the child to confide with were a male. The child might be so conditioned that it does not report the situation to the one person capable of protecting it.
Allowing a child to be exposed to some low level danger may in the long run be preferable to trying to ensure 100% security. Wrapping a child in cotton wool is no different in this situation than others such as not allowing the child to engage in active sports in case of injury.
I do not subscribe to the theory of children's safety above all other considerations, particularly when the potential for adult misbehaviour is low or even if possible, would be of a very minor nature that would perhaps go unnoticed by the child. Such improbable and perhaps insignificant misbehaviour could be far less damaging to the child than the message that child may be learning from the preventative policies. That all men are not to be trusted. That it is ok to humiliate a person just because that person is a man and is trust into a situation not of his choosing. What if the child were at some stage to be interfered with by a female adult and the only other person for the child to confide with were a male. The child might be so conditioned that it does not report the situation to the one person capable of protecting it.
Allowing a child to be exposed to some low level danger may in the long run be preferable to trying to ensure 100% security. Wrapping a child in cotton wool is no different in this situation than others such as not allowing the child to engage in active sports in case of injury.