pixel
DIY Trader
- Joined
- 3 February 2010
- Posts
- 5,359
- Reactions
- 345
I have long been waiting for an argument like that.Is the way some religions treat women "part of there culture"acceptable then?
Also the one that sptrawler raised, where do I draw the line.
Answer: I am abhorred by all kinds of cruelty. Whether it's directed against winged, feathered, furred, two-legged, eight-legged, or anything in between. And since some "animals" have invented religions to exert mental pain in addition to physical pain, both those kinds come under the same banner where human animals are concerned.
However, I would neither persecute a lion in Africa for feeding on a zebra, nor a cat on a farm in Europe for hunting and killing mice. However, I will protect Australian wildlife from being hunted and killed by a cat - or a fox, or any "introduced" species.
By extension, I accept that there are groups of people, who have survived in their natural habitat by hunting and gathering food sources that Westernised city dwellers can neither comprehend nor stomach.
By all means, talk to such groups, explain if it is objectively unsustainable. I cases like pandas, orangutans, tigers... give them a viable alternative and work with local governments to protect those animals from extinction or even pain for entertainment.
But don't tell anybody your own view is better because you're a civilised Westerner and they're barbarians. They might prove you right by judging you by their own standard.