Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

London Riots

GG you will be able to how may SK you can fit in the boot of a Roller one day, Do Rr may a trailer?
 
Much is being said about the vandals and rioters not really being to blame for their actions because they are so socially deprived. Precious little snowflakes, huh.

Many of them have been reared on welfare and have never developed any sense of taking responsibility for their own outcomes.

If they feel so disadvantaged, perhaps they could be picked up en masse and deposited in the famine ridden countries of Africa. Then they might get just a glimmer of understanding of real disadvantage.
 
Much is being said about the vandals and rioters not really being to blame for their actions because they are so socially deprived. Precious little snowflakes, huh.
From what I've seen, even the left wing press has been pretty scathing of the looters. Sure, it's been an opportunity for those to raise opposition to certain budget cuts, but for the moment everyone seems pretty keen to punish the guilty.

Some may enjoy this - http://photoshoplooter.tumblr.com
 
because repression works!

Cameron said authorities were looking at ways of stopping people communicating via social media websites if they were suspected of plotting "criminality and violence".

i love the endless knee-jerk reactions from government in this day and age. nothing about root causes, no admission of policy failure or even the slightest hint of reassessment, just restriction of communication, curfews, banning of hoodies and lots of ...

some_dipsh!t_politician_with_his_nose_in_the_trough said:
"To the law-abiding people, I say we will protect you. if you had your livelihood or property damaged, we will compenste you. We are on your side. To the lawless minority, I say this: We will track you down and we will punish you. You will pay for what you have done."

yeah i'm sure "they" will pay :rolleyes:
 
Don't they just send all the poor buggers to the next world war every time this happens.

The other option of sending them to Botany Bay and Port Arthur can't work as we have closed the facilities :D
 
The World's First Bludger Uprising

David Penberthy adds a little Australian perspective to England's woes in The Punch yesterday:

THIS wasn't a poll tax protest, it wasn't a show of solidarity with the coalminers or the sacked printers, it wasn't a G20 riot. At least burning down McDonald's outside a conference promoting free trade makes a crude kind of point. This was simply an act of mass theft, violence and vandalism by people who, almost to a man, said that they were doing it for fun. It was the first bludger uprising the world has ever seen.
 
Talking to a friend of a friend who taught in high schools around some of the areas affect and they were saying you have no idea how harden the kids are.

Dalrymple in this article pretty much gives everyone a serve but the numbers he quotes are pretty bad clearly policy failures from all levels of government and community.

Mind you after reading the tabloid rubbish its enough to turn anyone into a moron.

A couple of quotes

considerable proportion of the country's young population (a proportion that is declining) is ugly, aggressive, vicious, badly educated, uncouth and criminally inclined.

This is not an exaggeration. After compulsory education (or perhaps I should say intermittent attendance at school) up to the age of 16 costing $80,000 a head, about one-quarter of British children cannot read with facility or do simple arithmetic. It makes you proud to be a British taxpayer.

British youth leads the Western world in almost all aspects of social pathology, from teenage pregnancy to drug taking, from drunkenness to violent criminality. There is no form of bad behaviour that our version of the welfare state has not sought out and subsidised.

British children are much likelier to have a television in their bedroom than a father living at home.


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...upt-ruling-elite/story-e6frg6zo-1226112640970
 
Some good points made here, from one of the most Right Wing daily papers from the UK.

If only someone would listen.


The moral decay of our society is as bad at the top as the bottom – Telegraph Blogs



"David Cameron, Ed Miliband and the entire British political class came together yesterday to denounce the rioters. They were of course right to say that the actions of these looters, arsonists and muggers were abhorrent and criminal, and that the police should be given more support.But there was also something very phony and hypocritical about all the shock and outrage expressed in parliament. MPs spoke about the week’s dreadful events as if they were nothing to do with them.

I cannot accept that this is the case. Indeed, I believe that the criminality in our streets cannot be dissociated from the moral disintegration in the highest ranks of modern British society. The last two decades have seen a terrifying decline in standards among the British governing elite. It has become acceptable for our politicians to lie and to cheat. An almost universal culture of selfishness and greed has grown up.
It is not just the feral youth of Tottenham who have forgotten they have duties as well as rights. So have the feral rich of Chelsea and Kensington. A few years ago, my wife and I went to a dinner party in a large house in west London. A security guard prowled along the street outside, and there was much talk of the “north-south divide”, which I took literally for a while until I realised that my hosts were facetiously referring to the difference between those who lived north and south of Kensington High Street.
Most of the people in this very expensive street were every bit as deracinated and cut off from the rest of Britain as the young, unemployed men and women who have caused such terrible damage over the last few days. For them, the repellent Financial Times magazine How to Spend It is a bible. I’d guess that few of them bother to pay British tax if they can avoid it, and that fewer still feel the sense of obligation to society that only a few decades ago came naturally to the wealthy and better off.

Yet we celebrate people who live empty lives like this. A few weeks ago, I noticed an item in a newspaper saying that the business tycoon Sir Richard Branson was thinking of moving his headquarters to Switzerland. This move was represented as a potential blow to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, because it meant less tax revenue. I couldn’t help thinking that in a sane and decent world such a move would be a blow to Sir Richard, not the Chancellor.

People would note that a prominent and wealthy businessman was avoiding British tax and think less of him. Instead, he has a knighthood and is widely feted. The same is true of the brilliant retailer Sir Philip Green. Sir Philip’s businesses could never survive but for Britain’s famous social and political stability, our transport system to shift his goods and our schools to educate his workers.
Yet Sir Philip, who a few years ago sent an extraordinary £1 billion dividend offshore, seems to have little intention of paying for much of this. Why does nobody get angry or hold him culpable? I know that he employs expensive tax lawyers and that everything he does is legal, but he surely faces ethical and moral questions just as much as does a young thug who breaks into one of Sir Philip’s shops and steals from it?

Our politicians – standing sanctimoniously on their hind legs in the Commons yesterday – are just as bad. They have shown themselves prepared to ignore common decency and, in some cases, to break the law. David Cameron is happy to have some of the worst offenders in his Cabinet. Take the example of Francis Maude, who is charged with tackling public sector waste – which trade unions say is a euphemism for waging war on low‑paid workers. Yet Mr Maude made tens of thousands of pounds by breaching the spirit, though not the law, surrounding MPs’ allowances.

A great deal has been made over the past few days of the greed of the rioters for consumer goods, not least by Rotherham MP Denis MacShane who accurately remarked, “What the looters wanted was for a few minutes to enter the world of Sloane Street consumption.” This from a man who notoriously claimed £5,900 for eight laptops. Of course, as an MP he obtained these laptops legally through his expenses.
Yesterday, the veteran Labour MP Gerald Kaufman asked the Prime Minister to consider how these rioters can be “reclaimed” by society. Yes, this is indeed the same Gerald Kaufman who submitted a claim for three months’ expenses totalling £14,301.60, which included £8,865 for a Bang & Olufsen television.
Or take the Salford MP Hazel Blears, who has been loudly calling for draconian action against the looters. I find it very hard to make any kind of ethical distinction between Blears’s expense cheating and tax avoidance, and the straight robbery carried out by the looters.

The Prime Minister showed no sign that he understood that something stank about yesterday’s Commons debate. He spoke of morality, but only as something which applies to the very poor: “We will restore a stronger sense of morality and responsibility – in every town, in every street and in every estate.” He appeared not to grasp that this should apply to the rich and powerful as well.
The tragic truth is that Mr Cameron is himself guilty of failing this test. It is scarcely six weeks since he jauntily turned up at the News International summer party, even though the media group was at the time subject to not one but two police investigations. Even more notoriously, he awarded a senior Downing Street job to the former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, even though he knew at the time that Coulson had resigned after criminal acts were committed under his editorship. The Prime Minister excused his wretched judgment by proclaiming that “everybody deserves a second chance”. It was very telling yesterday that he did not talk of second chances as he pledged exemplary punishment for the rioters and looters.

These double standards from Downing Street are symptomatic of widespread double standards at the very top of our society. It should be stressed that most people (including, I know, Telegraph readers) continue to believe in honesty, decency, hard work, and putting back into society at least as much as they take out. But there are those who do not. Certainly, the so-called feral youth seem oblivious to decency and morality. But so are the venal rich and powerful – too many of our bankers, footballers, wealthy businessmen and politicians.

Of course, most of them are smart and wealthy enough to make sure that they obey the law. That cannot be said of the sad young men and women, without hope or aspiration, who have caused such mayhem and chaos over the past few days. But the rioters have this defence: they are just following the example set by senior and respected figures in society. Let’s bear in mind that many of the youths in our inner cities have never been trained in decent values. All they have ever known is barbarism. Our politicians and bankers, in sharp contrast, tend to have been to good schools and universities and to have been given every opportunity in life.

Something has gone horribly wrong in Britain. If we are ever to confront the problems which have been exposed in the past week, it is essential to bear in mind that they do not only exist in inner-city housing estates.

The culture of greed and impunity we are witnessing on our TV screens stretches right up into corporate boardrooms and the Cabinet. It embraces the police and large parts of our media. It is not just its damaged youth, but Britain itself that needs a moral reformation."
:)
 
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-14/pair-charged-with-triple-murder-during-london-riots/2838434

Pair charged with triple murder during London riots
Updated August 14, 2011 10:29:10

British police say a man and a teenager will face a British court charged with the murder of three men hit by a car while defending their neighbourhood against looters in Birmingham, according to police.



Murder for defending themselves and their neighbourhood gets on my nerves.

Where was police to do their job?

Why people don’t have immunity for defending themselves?

Especially that riots and war are not included in insurance cover.

Sure property can be replaced, but don’t forget that many people work all their lives often for generations to take it so lightly.

Shows how vulnerable community is where only criminals have access to weapons.
 
I have heard its also Asians vs Muslims in that area and the car attack was racist.

I agree with Lanterns post which I also read in the AGE, it is about moral decay throughout society.
 
...
I agree with Lanterns post which I also read in the AGE, it is about moral decay throughout society.

Exactly.

I understand that it is nice thing to do to accept anybody and everybody into our society, but I know that there are necessary things to do to keep solid fabric of our society and this is: PERMANENT EXCLUSION of certain elements.

Call it whatever you want, but people who elect to work against society are not going all of the sudden be exemplary citizens.

We can see that more and more people choose to work against society and because it is not stamped out it slowly leads toward anarchy and moral decay.

In my opinion not every human snowflake deserves the same privileges.
 
The culture of greed and impunity we are witnessing on our TV screens stretches right up into corporate boardrooms and the Cabinet. It embraces the police and large parts of our media. It is not just its damaged youth, but Britain itself that needs a moral reformation."
:)

To sleep well at night, you either need to be honest in your dealings, or be adept at storing guilty memories in an inaccessible part of the mind. That inaccessible section can fill up over a lifetime, then seek expression in some form or other. No need to demonize the wealthy people who cheat; they're creating their own personal demons.
 
Murder for defending themselves and their neighbourhood gets on my nerves.

Think you may need to read the report again Happy.

The two perps in the car who were charged, drove their car into a group of folk who were defending their shops killing three of them.
 
Extract from David Penberthy's column today:
Why are people rioting in Britain but not in Africa?

Here's another question. Why are we seeing more panic and hysteria on the floors of the western world's stock exchanges and among investors than we are in the Somalian camps where, according to the latest figures, one in every ten children under the age of five will be dead by November?

I'd add that it's difficult to see the logic of the term 'refugees' being equally applied to the healthy looking asylum seekers on our borders and the exhausted, resigned people who nonetheless exude a palpable dignity, in Africa.
 
Top