Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Rorting Labour School Stimulus Package

The BER stories keep coming. Amazing what the unique mix of bureacracy and wanton stimulus packages can achieve.

http://www.theage.com.au/national/t...kshelves-an-optional-extra-20100412-s485.html

To quote from The Age article:

'They consulted the NSW Department of Education's website and learnt that a library suitable for their school was estimated to cost $285,000. The rest of the money, the delighted school council figured, could be used to turn the old library into a computer laboratory, fix fire-safety concerns in the infants department and generally spruce up the school.
That's not how it turned out. The government bureaucrats in charge of the scheme ignored local builders and chose a building contractor in Wollongong, who subcontracted the job to another operator on the far-away NSW south coast.
''The building turned up prefabricated on the back of three trucks and was assembled in an afternoon,'' Ms Suthern said.
Then came the shock. The job had come in at $908,000.
Worse, the so-called library had no fire door, no shelves for books and instead of the expected double glazing to cope with freezing high plains winters, there were louvres, despite stamped plans to the contrary. The only heating was by unflued gas heaters, which meant the louvres had to be open when they were operating. There were no rainwater tanks, as ordered, and no solar panels on the roof. A pocket handkerchief of concrete out front was billed at $9000, an access track that already existed at $8000.'

Bonzer. The only certainty with the BER will be that Gillard will escape sanction despite being Education Minister and, no doubt, some faceless apparatchik will take the blame.

Tick tock...
 
A COVERED outdoor learning area that was to cost a NSW school $954,000 under Julia Gillard's $16 billion schools building program has been scrapped after an audit revealed it was not "value for money".

NSW Education Minister Verity Firth this morning told Ray Hadley's 2GB the Hastings Public School at Port Macquarie would instead have four classrooms built.

The school shot to prominence after it was revealed last week that a similar structure had been built for $78,000 in 2003.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-...of-proposed-cola/story-fn56ulhe-1225845233461

Pigs in the trough ... Pigs in the trough
 
This just in: government money wasted. Details at 5.

Christ, the people doing my extension, coming highly recommended, managed to fill my budget. I decided that, actually, I would probably find it cheaper to move. Wait, they said, we can economise. I very much doubt you can make it worth my while, I said, but go nuts.

Came back with a plan where the second toilet was removed (to be added later) and with me doing the cleanup and some of the internal painting. Saved $60,000.

Sixty grand, for a toilet? Seriously? It's right next to the bathroom, and we're getting the room and tiling done anyway, ready for when we put a new bog in later on.

What was it, gold? A papier mache built from Berkshire Hathaway shares?

Yes, corrupt builders are corrupt. Next time a government wants to dump a metric ****-load of money on the electorare I can only hope I'm in a sector to pad my bill. My vote is for sale!

What I've not seen is any description of how the other mob would have done better. Right along, when KRudd screamed "LOOK! MONEY!", the other side sort of shuffled about and basically agreed that they'd have totally given just as much money, just in unspecified "different ways". Don't worry, electorate, we'll bribe you too!

Same ****, different shoebox.

Dump a few Bill' on the rubes, and some is going to get carried away in buckets. I'm yet to see a government who could do it. I could have written these news articles six months ago and waited to fill in the names.
 
Oh God, it just keeps getting worse.
And it seems likely they're about to be let loose to further stuff up what's left of our health system.:(
 
Oh God, it just keeps getting worse.
And it seems likely they're about to be let loose to further stuff up what's left of our health system.:(

Just wait till the NBN kicks off and the contracts go out for laying fibre. :D
 
Spending up big to sort out their own balls-ups is the new stimulus package.
 

Attachments

  • 940258-100413-kudelka.jpg
    940258-100413-kudelka.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 140
Mr Orgill is being paid nearly $1,000 per day to head the task force. I doubt that someone being paid that much would find the builders' charges excessive.


ABC News
Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard ordered the probe into the $16.2 billion school building program after claims of massive cost blowouts and rorting.

Former chief executive of UBS Australia, Brad Orgill, is heading the $14 million task force which will look into 150 formal complaints.

Mr Orgill made his first inspection at Dobroyd Point Public School in Sydney's inner west today.

He says he will visit 100 schools in the next three months and deliver an interim report to Ms Gillard in August.
 
They will find minute cases of rorting I believe. I think a lot of you have made the assumption that builders are simply doubling there quote as a result of this being a government funded project. Where seeing these cost blowouts because if you give architects a rough figure and tell them to go nuts they will. Some architect’s charges are based on the contract value so it’s in their best interests for cost blowouts. These jobs consist of complex designs involving a substantial amount of steel and often contradictions in the plans, builders must cover their backside so they obviously quote it accordingly to the amount of risk the job poses. I don’t see how the rorting can occur when most projects I have seen have had three separate quotes, in construction the expensive price is often having a lend the cheapest have missed something and the middle quote is about right.
Oh and yes the project is an absolute waste of tax dollars.
 
They will find minute cases of rorting I believe. I think a lot of you have made the assumption that builders are simply doubling there quote as a result of this being a government funded project. Where seeing these cost blowouts because if you give architects a rough figure and tell them to go nuts they will. Some architect’s charges are based on the contract value so it’s in their best interests for cost blowouts. These jobs consist of complex designs involving a substantial amount of steel and often contradictions in the plans, builders must cover their backside so they obviously quote it accordingly to the amount of risk the job poses. I don’t see how the rorting can occur when most projects I have seen have had three separate quotes, in construction the expensive price is often having a lend the cheapest have missed something and the middle quote is about right.
Oh and yes the project is an absolute waste of tax dollars.

The majority I have seen from the builders have been a decent drink, but fair considering how much they are stuffed around on the job. It's the management (main contractor) that sees the blowout of the prices.
The sub-contractors quotes are different to the main contractors ending price by a fair bit. In my experience the main contractors are also useless in so many ways. I'm surprised anything was built at all.
 
Top