Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

The Health and Fitness Thread

Where do you get long chain Omega 3
with a vegan diet ?

Where does the Pritikin/Ornish diet provide them ?

If you say from a capsule

Well you are not starting with a wholesome natural human diet
But a deficient one..

Taurine
Vitamin A ( not same as beta carotene )
Zinc
B 12

etc

All these things esp long chain omega 3
should be provided by diet
ALA is not same
and liver has limited ability to convert

important eg macular degeneration epidemic
melanoma epidemic
etc


motorway

Problems with essential fatty acids: time for a new paradigm?


Unsaturated fatty acids: Nutritionally essential, or toxic?

Coronary heart disease mortality among Seventh-Day Adventists with differing dietary habits: a preliminary report
 
thanks for the advice guys, all good if you are obsessive , but most of us are not.

What doctors need to realise is that they are a service industry, just like a coffee shop, trades assistant or a lawn mowing business.

The people who determine our wealth are farmers, miners and inustrialists.

Actors, entaertainment provide tittilation and occasionally a big win like Hoges.

Doctors preach at people and are in the hold of either the Guvment or bigPharma to dope people out to make a profit, pure and simple, or to deny them essential services by building a huge bureaucracy in the case of Guvment.

All this wheat crap, is just that, crap.

I eat usually good food , pasta, steak, eyetie, chinese and salami.

I could not give a stuff whether I die today or in forty years time.

The problem is with all these obsessive old farts who want to live forever.

We are keeping all these people alive and will pay for it in 20 years time with huge asylums full of demented old yorks with current gym and health food shop memberships.

gg

What truck drivers need to realise is that they are a service industry - they produce nothing;)
 
Study from way back in 2003 ?

is hardly preliminary

More like old hat.

motorway

I early await the first longitudinal epidemiological paper of Paleo dieters...

At this point, ovo lacto vegetarian SDAs have a definitive physiological and functional health advantage.
 
Best advise I ever received for the average joe,

For Breakie - bake beans on toast, egg on toast, ham and cheese on toast,chicken and cheese on toast, grill the latter with a sandwich maker, special K, Spanish omelet, oaks

Brunch - Fruit

Lunch - Salad, protein, bit of carbs - Sushi, Kebab, Sumo Salad, 6 inch Subway, or bring your own

Afternoon knack - nut bar

Dinner - too easy - tuna/chicken/steak/lamb with salad, add some carbs - ratio 1/4 carbs/1/4 protein/1/2 salad ... don't eat crap which includes chips.

Also get a pedometer, make sure you do 10,000 steps every day ... do this , you don't need a personal trainer.

Want to tone up, look at free weight ... push ups, sit ups, nearby anything that allows you to do pull ups.

Eat and exercise how we are supposed to. No need for anything extreme at all.
 
I early await the first longitudinal epidemiological paper of Paleo dieters...

At this point, ovo lacto vegetarian SDAs have a definitive physiological and functional health advantage.



So I take it from your response
that Dean Ornish claims long chain Omega 3 is unnecessary
in the diet


That was the question I asked :)

If so that is good to know :D

Paleo is a word covers many things
some things that are clearly not Paleo

In any case

There is a terrific amount of research
being done


Evolutionary perspectives are informing
many aspects of medicine and health

look at supplementation of infant formulas
With DHA etc



motorway
 
So I take it from your response
that Dean Ornish claims long chain Omega 3 is unnecessary
in the diet


That was the question I asked :)

If so that is good to know :D

My view is that every couple of years, someone comes along and puts a new brick in the wall of scientific knowledge. Many knowingly or unknowingly place more weight on that one brick than the whole wall.....and build religious zeal for that.

I am 50, and have been interested in natural therapies and diet since I was 14. I've seen one fad after another come and go in the alternative field and the medical field.

Maybe you are right that longitundinal studies of paleo diet will reveal some health advantage......

At this point, Dean Ornish's research upholds many of the papers I've read through the years. Though I am not a dietitian or gastroenterologist, and do not avidly keep up with all the issues.

If you want to know the detail of his views on PUFAs, they are probably out there in google land or on medline.

What I'd recommend though if you want to search medline, is first read literature review articles that orient you on an issue, and help clarify who the respected peers are.

Now I am off to bed as I have to be up for a nice 70k cycle early in the morning.....before the truckies get out after a night on the fatty food and booze.... :)
 
My view is that every couple of years, someone comes along and puts a new brick in the wall of scientific knowledge. Many knowingly or unknowingly place more weight on that one brick than the whole wall.....and build religious zeal for that.

I am 50, and have been interested in natural therapies and diet since I was 14. I've seen one fad after another come and go in the alternative field and the medical field.

Maybe you are right that longitundinal studies of paleo diet will reveal some health advantage......

At this point, Dean Ornish's research upholds many of the papers I've read through the years. Though I am not a dietitian or gastroenterologist, and do not avidly keep up with all the issues.

If you want to know the detail of his views on PUFAs, they are probably out there in google land or on medline.

What I'd recommend though if you want to search medline, is first read literature review articles that orient you on an issue, and help clarify who the respected peers are.

Now I am off to bed as I have to be up for a nice 70k cycle early in the morning.....before the truckies get out after a night on the fatty food and booze.... :)

Mate.

Just be aware that in 1 or 200 years folk will access this site and giggle about your anal take on diet.

What goes down, comes out.

gg

M
 
My view is that every couple of years, someone comes along and puts a new brick in the wall of scientific knowledge. Many knowingly or unknowingly place more weight on that one brick than the whole wall.....and build religious zeal for that.

I am 50, and have been interested in natural therapies and diet since I was 14. I've seen one fad after another come and go in the alternative field and the medical field.

Maybe you are right that longitundinal studies of paleo diet will reveal some health advantage......

At this point, Dean Ornish's research upholds many of the papers I've read through the years. Though I am not a dietitian or gastroenterologist, and do not avidly keep up with all the issues.

If you want to know the detail of his views on PUFAs, they are probably out there in google land or on medline.

What I'd recommend though if you want to search medline, is first read literature review articles that orient you on an issue, and help clarify who the respected peers are.

Now I am off to bed as I have to be up for a nice 70k cycle early in the morning.....before the truckies get out after a night on the fatty food and booze.... :)

Mate.

Just be aware that in 1 or 200 years folk will access this site and giggle about your anal take on diet.

What goes down, comes out.

gg
 
My view is that every couple of years, someone comes along and puts a new brick in the wall of scientific knowledge. Many knowingly or unknowingly place more weight on that one brick than the whole wall.....and build religious zeal for that.

I am 50, and have been interested in natural therapies and diet since I was 14. I've seen one fad after another come and go in the alternative field and the medical field.

Maybe you are right that longitundinal studies of paleo diet will reveal some health advantage......

At this point, Dean Ornish's research upholds many of the papers I've read through the years. Though I am not a dietitian or gastroenterologist, and do not avidly keep up with all the issues.

If you want to know the detail of his views on PUFAs, they are probably out there in google land or on medline.

What I'd recommend though if you want to search medline, is first read literature review articles that orient you on an issue, and help clarify who the respected peers are.

Now I am off to bed as I have to be up for a nice 70k cycle early in the morning.....before the truckies get out after a night on the fatty food and booze.... :)

Dr. Ornish: We recommend a total daily dose of 1000 mg of EPA and DHA combined. Fish oil supplements vary in their eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) content. Aim for a dosage that includes approximately 600 mg EPA and 400 mg DHA per day. This dosage is usually found in three grams of fish oil in capsule form per day.
:eek::eek::eek:

What is wrong with a diet that you need to supplement
To this extent ?

maybe LOTS ?

DYOR

DHA is so important for infants
it only gets into breast milk
If it is in the Mothers Diet

same way EPA & DHA gets into and makes up cellular membranes in your body
( in the skin , brain . macular etc etc )

for discussion

motorway
 
:eek::eek::eek:

What is wrong with a diet that you need to supplement
To this extent ?

maybe LOTS ?

DYOR

DHA is so important for infants
it only gets into breast milk
If it is in the Mothers Diet

same way EPA & DHA gets into and makes up cellular membranes in your body
( in the skin , brain . macular etc etc )

for discussion

motorway

I'll try and read up on PUFAs over the next week Motor, as it is flavor of the month in nutrition.

The comment I made earlier about one brick being overly emphasized in the wall of scientific knowledge applies here.

I accept Ornish advocates EFA supplementation, which is testament to his respect for current scientific consensus. As far as I know, he is a dedicated vegetarian who has for decades followed the teachings of a Hindu Yogi Swami Satchidananda.

However, there are examples of landlocked communities (Ecuador, Bhutan, Tibet) who rarely if ever eat fish, and only minimal other flesh....certainly not enough to meet the levels the literature advocates.

Considering these communities have survived for thousands of years, you have to assume DHA has not been an issue for lactating mothers or anyone else.

Females also have a greater ability to convert ALA into EFA and DHA.

Seventh Day adventists also have a long history of giving birth to and rearing healthy children.

Further, an old peer of mine once said it doesn't pay to get too hung up on every micronutrient. She told of her experiences in Nazi occupied Poland, where she followed more than 12 women as they gave birth to and nurture healthy normal babies on a diet of flour and condensed milk.

Finally, inflammation certainly is a modern day scourge. However, it is not well elucidated what the cause of the this scourge is. n6:n3 ratio to my knowledge has not been proven to be the essential cause. It may very well be non diet related.
 
Considering these communities have survived for thousands of years, you have to assume DHA has not been an issue for lactating mothers or anyone else.

You have a very piecemeal approach

Humans have survived on all sorts of diets

even very bad ones

an optimal diet will provide all nutrients
without the need for supplements

with low anti nutrient load

eg

Humans can not make Vitamin C
So it has to come from food

slaves and serfs throughout the ages
have lived on shocking diets

people live on cigarettes and whiskey

but all that means ZIP

If we need B12 . Zinc .. Iodine
If we need long chaing omega 3
if we need Taurine

Vitamin A etc etc

And we need to fortify or supplement as a matter of course
Then the diet being promoted is not optimal
or built on sound principles

or a natural Human being Diet

It is a fad diet

And instead of being in nature

You are in a feedlot
with all the supplements they needed

YES don't focus on one nutrient or
one disease process

Get back to first principles
and a holistic approach

forget the Swami imo

and look to Science based evidence



Timeframe for cereal grain domestication. There are 8 major cereal grains which are consumed by modern man (wheat, rye, barley, oats, corn, rice, sorghum, and millet) [Harlan 1992]. Each of these grains were derived from wild precursors whose original ranges were quite localized [Harlan 1992]. Wheat and barley were domesticated only ~10,000 years ago in the Near East; rice was domesticated approximately 7,000 years ago in China, India, and southeast Asia; corn was domesticated 7,000 years ago in Central and South America; millets were domesticated in Africa 5,000-6,000 years ago; sorghum was domesticated in East Africa 5,000-6,000 years ago; rye was domesticated ~5,000 years ago in southwest Asia; and oats were domesticated ~3,000 years ago in Europe.

Consequently, the present-day edible grass seeds simply would have been unavailable to most of mankind until after their domestication because of their limited geographic distribution. Also, the wild version of these grains were much smaller than the domesticated versions and extremely difficult to harvest [Zohary 1969].

How recent in the human evolutionary experience is grain consumption in terms of our total dietary experience? The first member of the human genus, Homo, was Homo habilis who has now been dated to ~2.33 million years ago (MYA) [Kimbel et al. 1996]. Homo erectus, who had post-cranial (the rest of the body below the skull) body proportions similar to modern humans, appeared in Africa by about 1.7 MYA and is thought to have left Africa and migrated to Asia by 1 MYA or perhaps even earlier [Larick and Ciochon 1996]. Archaic Homo sapiens (called by some, Homo heidelbergensis) has been dated to 600,000 years ago in Africa and to about 400,000 years ago in Europe or perhaps earlier [De Castro et al. 1997].

Anatomically modern Homo sapiens appear in the fossil record in Africa and the Mideast by about 90,000-110,000 years ago and behaviorally modern H. sapiens are known in the fossil record by ~50,000 years ago in Australia and by about ~40,000 yrs ago in Europe.

The so-called "Agricultural Revolution" (primarily the domestication of animals, cereal grains, and legumes) occurred first in the Near East about 10,000 years ago and spread to northern Europe by about 5,000 years ago [Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1993]. The industrial revolution occurred roughly 200 years ago, and the technological revolution which brought us packaged, processed foods is primarily a development that has occurred in the past 100 years and has seen enormous growth in the last 50 years.

To gauge how little geologic or evolutionary time humans have been exposed to foods wrought by the agricultural revolution, let's do a little paper experiment. Take a stack of computer paper (the kind in which each page is connected to one another) and count out 212 eleven-inch (28-cm) pages. Then unravel the stack of paper and lay it out end to end--it will form a continuous 194-foot (59-meter) strip. Now, let's assume that 1 inch (2.54 cm) equals 1,000 years in our 194-foot strip of computer paper; thus, the first part of the first page represents the emergence of our genus 2.33 MYA and the last part of the last page represents the present day.

Now, take a slow walk down all 194 feet of the computer paper, and carefully look at each of the individual eleven-inch sections. When you get to the very last eleven-inch section (the 212th section), this represents approximately the beginning of agriculture in the Mideast 10,000 years ago; therefore, during the preceding 211 sheets humanity's foods were derived from wild plants and animals. This little experiment will allow you to fully grasp how recent in the human evolutionary experience are cereal grains (as well as dairy products, salt, and the fatty meats of domesticated animals).

Humans may have indeed eaten these foods for "millennia," but millennia (even 10 millennia) in the overall timeframe of human existence represents 0.4%. Because the estimated amount of genetic change (0.005%) which has occurred in the human genome over this time period is negligible, the genetic makeup of modern man has remained essentially unchanged from that of pre-agricultural man [Eaton et al. 1985].

Consequently, the human genome is most ideally adapted to those foods which were available to pre-agricultural man, namely lean muscle meats, limited fatty organ meats, and wild fruits and vegetables--but, significantly, not grains, legumes, dairy products, or the very high-fat carcasses of modern domesticated animals.

Repercussions of antinutrient load.

As has been suggested by John Yudkin almost 30 years ago, cereal grains are a relatively recent food for hominids and our physiologies are still adjusting and adapting to their presence. Clearly, no human can live on a diet composed entirely of cereal grains (for one thing they have no vitamin C).

However, that is but one consideration, since eating raw cereal grains (as well as cooked cereal grains) wreaks havoc on the primate gut because of the high antinutrient content of grains. When cereal grain calories reach 50% or more of the daily caloric intake, humans suffer severe health consequences. One has to look no further than the severe pellagra epidemics of the late 19th century in America and the beri-beri scourges of southeast Asia to confirm this.
Additionally, in not only human beings, but in virtually every animal model studied (dog, rat, guinea pig, baboon, etc.), high cereal grain consumption promotes and induces rickets and osteomalacia [Robertson 1981; Ewer 1950; Sly 1984; Ford 1972, 1977; MacAuliffe 1976; Hidiroglou 1980; Dagnelie 1990]. Recent research has also implicated zinc deficiency due to the effects of excessive cereal grain consumption in retarding skeletal growth [Reinhold 1971; Halsted 1972; Sandstrom 1987; Golub 1996], including cases of hypogonadal dwarfism seen in modern-day Iran.

The pathologies introduced by higher levels of cereal grain consumption discussed above are due primarily to the effects of phytates in grains, which bind to minerals, preventing adequate uptake. To this point, we haven't even touched upon the other antinutrients which inflict damage on a wide variety of human physiological systems.

These antinutrients include protease inhibitors, alkylrescorcinols, alpha-amylase inhitors, molecular-mimicking proteins, etc. We will look further at these additional problems below. Clearly, however, cereal grains cannot contribute substantial calories to the diet of primates unless they are cooked and processed.




motorway
 
You have a very piecemeal approach

Humans have survived on all sorts of diets

even very bad ones

an optimal diet will provide all nutrients
without the need for supplements

with low anti nutrient load

eg

Humans can not make Vitamin C
So it has to come from food

slaves and serfs throughout the ages
have lived on shocking diets

people live on cigarettes and whiskey

but all that means ZIP

If we need B12 . Zinc .. Iodine
If we need long chaing omega 3
if we need Taurine

Vitamin A etc etc

And we need to fortify or supplement as a matter of course
Then the diet being promoted is not optimal
or built on sound principles

or a natural Human being Diet

It is a fad diet

And instead of being in nature

You are in a feedlot
with all the supplements they needed

YES don't focus on one nutrient or
one disease process

Get back to first principles
and a holistic approach

forget the Swami imo

and look to Science based evidence










motorway

Don't worry mate,

In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king.

If I ever get short of a quid I'll open a fat farm/beauty feed lot.

I just haven't presently got the the patience to put up with the dills who'd sign up.

But if times get tough , thats where I'll be.

gg
 
I just made the best tasting Green Smoothie so far. The Starfruit tree and Lime tree in the back yard are fruiting their heads off so I added a bit of each.

Blend the following:

Big handful of dandelion leaves and Spinach leaves
1/2 banana
1/3 Starfruit
1/2 Lime
1/2 Orange
(optional 1/2 tsp agave nectar sweetener)

Here's what the nutrient count looks like.

Dandelion leaves: A good source of Folate, Magnesium, Phosphorus and Copper,
and a very good source of Dietary Fiber, Vitamin A, Vitamin C, Vitamin E (Alpha Tocopherol),
Vitamin K, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Vitamin B6, Calcium, Iron, Potassium and Manganese.

Spinach leaves: A good source of Niacin and Zinc, and a very good source of Dietary Fiber,
Protein, Vitamin A, Vitamin C, Vitamin E (Alpha Tocopherol), Vitamin K, Thiamin, Riboflavin,
Vitamin B6, Folate, Calcium, Iron, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Copper and Manganese

Banana: A good source of Dietary Fiber, Vitamin C, Potassium and Manganese,
and a very good source of Vitamin B6

Starfruit: A good source of Pantothenic Acid and Potassium, and a very good source of
Dietary Fiber, Vitamin C and Copper.

Limes: A good source of Calcium, Iron and Copper, and a very good source of
Dietary Fiber and Vitamin C

Orange: A good source of Thiamin, Folate and Potassium, and a very good source of
Dietary Fiber and Vitamin C


If this doesn't appeal, then pull into the nearest truck stop cafe and fill yourself up with transfats instead.
 
You have a very piecemeal approach


forget the Swami imo

You missed my point for mentioning the swami......It was to highlight that Ornish is impartial enough to advocate rich omega 3 fish based products, in spite of his personal leaning towards a philosophy that advocates vegetarianism. It highlights his objectivity as a scientist.


and look to Science based evidence

motorway


I am all for respecting the science. So show me the science showing a Paleo diet gives a survival advantage in the long term for mankind living a contemporary western lifestyle.


 
Heli :)

there is mountains of stuff out there

Bit you need to seek facts and be unbiased ( don't we all )

eg

you said

However, there are examples of landlocked communities (Ecuador, Bhutan, Tibet) who rarely if ever eat fish, and only minimal other flesh....certainly not enough to meet the levels the literature advocates.










The most important crop in Tibet is barley, and dough made from barley flour called tsampa, is the staple food of Tibet. This is either rolled into noodles or made into steamed dumplings called momos. Meat dishes are likely to be yak, goat, or mutton, often dried, or cooked into a spicy stew with potatoes. Mustard seed is cultivated in Tibet, and therefore features heavily in its cuisine. Yak yoghurt, butter and cheese are frequently eaten, and well-prepared yoghurt is considered something of a prestige item. Butter tea is very popular to drink.

Due to the high altitude of Tibet, the water boils at 90 degree Celsius, and cooking with water is impossible. The diet and foods are peculiar in Tibet.

The Tibetan diet consists mostly of meat, milks and other high-protein foods. The main staple is `tsamba'. Tea is a necessary. Travelers usually bring dried meat, tsamba, and tea for foods.

Just like The difference between the Okinawans was their low grain consumption ( staple is sweet potato ) and high fish consumption compared to USA



in any case it is not my place to preach diet

But start from what nutrients are required
and go to what unprocessed foods can provide

eg all grain based foods are processed

eg an apple is not

evolutionary perspective is the right starting point
it is for all other aspects of the human condition

best of health
motorway:)
 
Heli :)

there is mountains of stuff out there

I haven't found any longitudinal studies of contemporary westerners following a Paleo diet.....the literature has many vegetarian studies though....especially out of Loma Linda university on Seventh Day Adventists....SDAs have even been compared with Baptists to control lifestyle and religious belief variables.
:)


Bit you need to seek facts and be unbiased ( don't we all )

eg

you said

However, there are examples of landlocked communities (Ecuador, Bhutan, Tibet) who rarely if ever eat fish, and only minimal other flesh....certainly not enough to meet the levels the literature advocates.

Your quote doesn't quantify meat eaten. You are inferring because the word meat is used at the beginning of one sentence, that that qualifies it as the primary component of their diet...


Just like The difference between the Okinawans was their low grain consumption ( staple is sweiet potato ) and high fish consumption compared to USA

in any case it is not my place to preach diet

But start from what nutrients are required
and go to what unprocessed foods can provide

starting with what nutrients are required ignores the ability of humans to adapt. ie many Asians are lactose intolerant. Hunter gatherers have higher rates of diabetes than westerners, when they take on a western diet


eg all grain based foods are processed

eg an apple is not

evolutionary perspective is the right starting point
it is for all other aspects of the human condition

best of health
motorway:)

Evolutionary perspective is only one piece of info, and not necessarily the best....genetic expression is not fixed in concrete.......environment does influence DNA transcription, via environmental pH, osmolarity, and oxygen concentration to name a few.

YOu and I will both be dead before an optimal diet is elaborated for the whole of mankind.

So you and I will just have to eat based on the literature as it presents today, or personal bias.
 
The Tibetan diet consists mostly of meat, milks and other high-protein foods.



You made it sound like they were on the ornish diet :)


Because the estimated amount of genetic change (0.005%) which has occurred in the human genome over this time period is negligible, the genetic makeup of modern man has remained essentially unchanged from that of pre-agricultural man

because all infants drink milk ( human )

the extension to lactose tolerance in adults over the last 10,000 years is not surprising or mean that milk is healthy ( just that it can be better tolerated )
it is not much of an adaption..

( the literature discusses this point )

but you miss the point

your quotes have no logic

Okinawans eat pork use pork fat
eat fish

you had them on the ornish diet too...

you have everyone on the ornish diet :)

hunter gatherers
pre agricultural man

NEVER

nor it seems Okinawans or Tibetans

and those who do consume extensive grain based diets
maybe it is the insect contamination that gets them by

eg weevils are a source of B 12

true ... papers even out there on this

So don't remove the weevils :):):)

motorway
 
The yak is truly "the treasure of the Plateau" as the inscription reads below the golden statue of yaks located in a busy intersection in downtown Lhasa.

In the mountain tundra and ice desert of the Tibetan Plateau with altitudes soaring over 19,000 feet, yaks flourish where other domestic beasts die. Because of this, the people inhabiting this region use the yak for everything.

"The yak is inescapable in Lhasa. The acrid, slightly sour smell of yak butter permeates the streets and temples where pilgrims burn the whitish yellow fat at innumerable altars and carry smoking candles through the streets."


Milk:
Yak milk is golden in color and very rich in fat at 7-8%. It has a sweetish taste.
Milk production from yaks is seasonal.
Hybrid yaks tend to yield more milk.
Milk can be rendered into powder, butter, yogurt, cheese, and Kurut.
Kurut is made from curdled milk which is churned, boiled and then drained.
The cream from yak milk, called Kaimak, thick, sweet, and yellow with a flavor like almonds.
Yak cheese is a hard, Swiss style cheese that fetches high prices in Kathmandu.
Tea is made with yak milk and is a staple part of the diet of Tibetan yak herders. Milk is also added to mushrooms to make a milk-mushroom stew.
Butter is the principal product from yak milk. It is a staple food for herdsmen and locals. Tea can be made from butter.

Meat:
Yak meat is beef-like, but more delicate in flavor, contains no marbling because the yak is a cold climate animal, and the fat is located around the outside of the body.
The fat content of yak meat is low (3.8%, 1/16th the fat of beef).
The cholesterol level is under 50.
Yak meat is high in protein (22.95%), and has less calories than beef or chicken breast!
In Central Asia yak meat is dried, or deep frozen in natures own freezer, for storage and portability.


----

No need for weevils :)

Yak meat = Paleo meat

and would contain long chain omega



motorway
 
Top