Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
I have to echo your somewhat sarcastic tone here, Kennas.Yes, my comment was slightly unthoughtful. How would aboriginies from northern Australia get down to the grape and fruit growing areas? And, how would they cope with being with their families? Impossible.
Sorry, touching on sarcastic now, and should be in another thread maybe. Or, perhaps it's linked. Pacific Islanders cross the shore to pick fruit, while aboriginies stay in Arnham Land, etc.
Maybe I'm not looking at this clearly right now, sorry.
And yes, of course if the airfares etc are intended to be paid for Pacific Island workers then they would likewise be paid for indigenous people to travel from their communities to where the work exists.
Nunthewiser has probably made the essential point (leaving out the bit about robbing grannies!) that harvesting work is mostly paid on productivity.
So if you can hack the physical demands and are motivated, then you can make money.
Who pays the airfares? Not sure but I got the impression that it was the government, so therefore, yes it would be a subsidy to the farmers.
Isn't that better than letting the fruit and vegetables rot on the ground because no one will pick them?
Hell, the government (we taxpayers) subsidise other industries so what's a bit more? Better than pouring money into car manufacturers who produce cars no one wants to buy any more.
Spaghetti, I accept your point about the downside. But if people are willing to leave their homes and families to go and work in the mines for extended periods, then it doesn't seem that fondness for the homefront is the determining factor.
I've spoken with plenty of people who follow the harvesting around Australia. It becomes a lifestyle for them. They like the outdoor work and say they can make really good money. It's always possible to find a reason not to work if you don't want to and the government says it's fine to sit at home.