- Joined
- 28 May 2006
- Posts
- 9,985
- Reactions
- 2
Now I know I am asking for trouble here based on a number of posts in this thread but here goes....
I have a friend in the AFP in Canberra and also know a couple of policemen in Qld who are reasonably well up the totem pole. All have said the same story so I'm not sure I have much reason to doubt it (as they don't know each other).
Now comes the hard part - noone would tell me any particular facts, except for all claiming that there was evidence against the said Dr Haneef on the terror front. But apparently the chances of prosecution were not high, so the charges were dropped and took the softer option of deportation instead. If true, it is NOT a Howard or Rudd issue - it is a policing and court issue (on a side note, I really wish people would stop reading political subtexts into stories, it absolutely sh**'s me when people grind political axes or justify political beliefs that way without knowing a shred of the real issue or fact). I don't know specifics on this case and I know I'll probably cop it for providing hearsay here, but that is what I have heard like it or lump it.
Read your own conclusions and please please please don't shoot the messenger.![]()
well since we're going hearsay.
I had a beer with a bloke ( a visiting professor, true story) in a gold coast hotel at the time
and he said he'd met Haneef's workmates
and they were outraged, and totally confident of his innocence, and totally happy to reemploy him (all as has been confirmed by subsequent press statements)