- Joined
- 15 November 2006
- Posts
- 1,206
- Reactions
- 679
* Self-funded retirees (fully or partially self-funded).
* Members of self-managed super funds.
* Property investors.
* Small business owners.
* Anyone earning $100k+ per annum.
All of the above were targeted by Labor policies, and identified as individuals who will need to pay more tax. Why is this inappropriate, and why didn't it work? A few thoughts:
* We do not have a budget emergency, we are almost in surplus. Far-reaching tax increases are not required, and will only serve to weaken the economy.
* The language used to support these policies was appalling. Trying to turn one group of voters against another.... YOU deserve a tax cut, whilst YOU are not paying enough. I thought Labor were about inclusiveness? How are retirees supposed to find the extra cash? Go back to work??
* Many of these individuals pay (and have paid) a LOT of tax, and employ people who pay a lot of tax.
Thankfully the approach didn't work. I'm not saying the Coalition are an attractive option, but at least they will get out of the way for a while, and not impose tax hikes with a scatter-gun approach.
As for climate change....well I don't think either side had great policy in this area, and I'm not holding my breath whilst the Coalition still have the ''conservative'' faction dictating policy decisions.
* Members of self-managed super funds.
* Property investors.
* Small business owners.
* Anyone earning $100k+ per annum.
All of the above were targeted by Labor policies, and identified as individuals who will need to pay more tax. Why is this inappropriate, and why didn't it work? A few thoughts:
* We do not have a budget emergency, we are almost in surplus. Far-reaching tax increases are not required, and will only serve to weaken the economy.
* The language used to support these policies was appalling. Trying to turn one group of voters against another.... YOU deserve a tax cut, whilst YOU are not paying enough. I thought Labor were about inclusiveness? How are retirees supposed to find the extra cash? Go back to work??
* Many of these individuals pay (and have paid) a LOT of tax, and employ people who pay a lot of tax.
Thankfully the approach didn't work. I'm not saying the Coalition are an attractive option, but at least they will get out of the way for a while, and not impose tax hikes with a scatter-gun approach.
As for climate change....well I don't think either side had great policy in this area, and I'm not holding my breath whilst the Coalition still have the ''conservative'' faction dictating policy decisions.