tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,417
- Reactions
- 6,356
T/H posted this in the Gann thread in reply to a poster.
I support T/H's view not only with regard to this claim but many other claims made by posters.
Many who make trading claims here I'm sure don't even trade.
Public web sites are full of rubbish as well as full of outrageous claims.
So how do you sort them out?
I believe you should be able to question these claims and if someone is using a real time example and claiming a particular result whether that be a singular event or a long term method.
If they are talking $$s then prove it if asked. Otherwise the claim is nothing BUT hot air and personal back slapping.
This should not be seen as egotistical but as credibility.
Those who are looking for real people with real claims must be able to ask for this and those who can supply it will have no problem in doing so. Those working on theory/hindsite or hypothesis wont. This is where the majority here and most public sites reside.
Opinion is fine but when your CLAIMING result then people have every right to question it.
Would certainly sort the wood from the chaff.
I think where people are making monetary claims with regard to results then they should be substantiated.Other wise they are just hot air.
I support T/H's view not only with regard to this claim but many other claims made by posters.
Many who make trading claims here I'm sure don't even trade.
Public web sites are full of rubbish as well as full of outrageous claims.
So how do you sort them out?
I believe you should be able to question these claims and if someone is using a real time example and claiming a particular result whether that be a singular event or a long term method.
If they are talking $$s then prove it if asked. Otherwise the claim is nothing BUT hot air and personal back slapping.
This should not be seen as egotistical but as credibility.
Those who are looking for real people with real claims must be able to ask for this and those who can supply it will have no problem in doing so. Those working on theory/hindsite or hypothesis wont. This is where the majority here and most public sites reside.
Opinion is fine but when your CLAIMING result then people have every right to question it.
Would certainly sort the wood from the chaff.
I think where people are making monetary claims with regard to results then they should be substantiated.Other wise they are just hot air.
