It does amaze me how people fall for the "cheap" thought. The shares are only "cheap" if you (not to anyone in specific, asking a rhetorical question here) expect last year's performance to continue into next year.
Here is the 100yr chart from the ASX, which quite frankly makes the current drop on the XAO insignificant when compared to the previous 100 years of progress.
I don't buy long term trend lines like this that ignores CPI. We had a big bout of inflation in the 1970s-80s, which caused a big boost in the XAO. There is no realistic prospect of returning to that trend line, because the scale has changed.
If you can find a 100 yr XAO rebased on CPI you will find quite a different and more believable trend in recent years. I think you'll find we're quite close to that trend.
Adjusting for CPI doesn't affect waves, so if waves are your thing you'll get much the same results.
Great point Davo. You'll get a more "believeable" trend, however even CPI is inconsistent and subjective.
Oz Wave.
the count on the 100 yr chart cant be correct as Wave 3 is the shortest wave.
One of the laws of Elliott is that Wave 3 cannot be the shortest.
You're starting to scare me OzWaveGuy, but thanks for the analysis, however depressing ;-) Would you happen to have a higher resolution image of that 100 year chart??
If so, maybe you could upload it to somewhere like http://transferbigfiles.com/
and paste the link here in this forum.
Here is a closer up shot.(click on image to expand)
Wave ... what do you mean by "Contrarian indicators apply in both bull and bear markets"?
If I may add to your chart $20shoes, there is also a very good morning star formation there (three candles underlined in blue).
I have literally banked money on the evening star at the top of extreme bull runs and am quietly confident that this correction is well overdone too, as indicated by the morning stars... and in EW terms it looks like a minor wave i and ii are in with iii (which typically extends), ready to launch.
I do believe we have the morning star trifecta.
Pretty reliable sign of a bullish trend reversal.
Oh, and the US indicies have turned to green, about 2%.
Wouldn't wanna be a bear tonight or tomorrow I don't think.
Wouldn't wanna be a bear tonight or tomorrow I don't think.
not so sure of the candles reliability whisk.
http://premium.working-money.com/wm/display.asp?art=329
"I analyzed 575 American stocks/bonds over a period of 15*20 years, from the early 1980s to the present. Using MetaStock's definition for candlestick patterns, those being international standards, I identified each candlestick formation and observed the trend starting from the day after the formation occurred. I looked for about 40 patterns and tabulated each trend's subsequent rise, decline, or neutral movement. My goal was to get statistical percentages on the most reliable candlestick formations". Giovanni Maiani
The second column shows the percentage of the total found, and the last column shows the percentage that preceded a rise, fall, or sideways movement on the following day
That's interesting treefrog, but I can see a serious flaw with this guy's research method straight off.
He says he is tracking the trend movement... on the basis of one candle the day after the formation of the pattern. One candle, especially the immediate one after the formation isn't a trend.
Wouldn't wanna be a bear tonight or tomorrow I don't think.
I do believe we have the morning star trifecta.
Pretty reliable sign of a bullish trend reversal.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?