- Joined
- 23 September 2007
- Posts
- 454
- Reactions
- 1
Buyers.
Hey Chuck Norris.
Punch into Google
"Find Chuck Norris" then hit
I'm feeling Lucky and see what you get.
That chart looks like a cross between snakes and pacman.
That chart looks like a cross between snakes and pacman.
Hey Whiskers ,, does it matter what elliot's waves are doing ?
What do the actual objective waves reveal
I would not be short atm
What do you see
the chart is a .05% x 3
being a %log chart it will amplify the appearance of reactive ( springiness )
support .... I have marked some ,,,,,
We have opposing vertical counts as well
look at the mid line ..
If we got a 1000 people of all ages and experience
and asked them to mark the top of every buying wave
and the bottom of every selling wave..
They would all agree without any special training
Because these waves are real and objective
and of stark clarity..
motorway
Whiskers,
The first wave against the trend is wave A.
So basically move your labelling to the left and you will find your wave d becomes wave e.
So any break of your lower trend line is very bearish.
I am not saying that is where we are going, just that your triangle following E.Wave theory should break to the downside, not up. Hope this helps.
This was sourced from the beginners guide for cynics which I have just sent to Kennas
Only if you still think the trend is down. I reckon we have had a clear trend reversal for wave i and wave ii is the triangle which will break up.
.
Wave 2 may be any corrective pattern except a Triangle.
Oh dear, mate... oh well, more market noise to confuse the sceptics.
[*]One must have an eye for detail.
[/LIST]
By definition wave 'ii' is a wave 'b'.
how can elliot wavers have two totally opposite analysis?
can appear as minute wave ii of iii which could make 1 of 5 impulse
It may unfold to be wave ii of iii which could make 1 of 3, or (1) or even (a)
There are a number of possibilities
Really, well I didn't know wave "ii" was a wave B, thanks for that Whiskers, highly entertaining.By definition wave 'ii' is a wave 'b'..
No comment I could go on but wasting my breath.I've drawn an illustration to show more clearly...
how can elliot wavers have two totally opposite analysis?
And you think fundamentals are any better? here is the Broker Consensus for NAB. Let's think about that:
1. Its one of the biggest stocks
2. Banking analysts ONLY live, breathe and analyze banks
3. They're all paid > $300k
For some reason, I couldn't make head nor tails of those expert recommendations, so I tried looking at them from a different viewpoint and suddenly they became crystal clear...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?