wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,971
- Reactions
- 13,284
Like any "guru" who is in to prediction; you shout the one call you got right in 1968 from the mountaintops and let 150,000 bad calls since, disappear into the mists of time.David Hunt. Geez
mate I wouldn't trust that guy for anything.
I went to various seminars that he runs through his co ADEST, where he promotes high profile gurus both local and overseas(mainly Gann and Elliott guys). Went to a few of these a few years ago with some other traders. For a seasoned chartist/trader Hunt should focus on his trade rather than trying to make a killing charging mega prices for people to see these guys!!
What's worse the forecasts both Hunt and these gurus were expecting back then never even eventuated..... Makes you wonder how this clown became head of the ATAA
What data IS more useful going back to 1900 for the Australian market??? I have not seen any but would love to.
brty
The most recent Smart Investor has David Hunt (President of ATAA) has targets of 4164 and "ultimate target" of 3440 (sometime next year). Ming you, he is referring to the XJO. But there is not much diff between the XJO and XAO chart wise.
Like any "guru" who is in to prediction; you shout the one call you got right in 1968 from the mountaintops and let 150,000 bad calls since, disappear into the mists of time.
It was like a couple EWers that used to post here (now banned) called gold and oil doomage. They were crowing about how right they called it... but forgot about the intervening up wave and crook timing that made them look like Wallies.
I called a bear market and economic doomage... I'm a guru... oops I called it a couple of years too soon...let's just ignore that shall we.
According to Premium DataData before 1980 is NOT 'data', as the ASX was not around
Hi,
Dhukka,
Don't know what I have done to upset you so much, but don't really care either.
On a monthly closing basis, the fall from '02-'03 was 17.39%.
The highest monthly close was 3363 in march with the lowest monthly close in '03 being 2778 in feb. No it's not the absolute highs and lows, but neither are any of the other corrections.
There were other corrections of similar magnitude on a monthly closing basis. None of those were included either.
I have included corrections of 25%+ as the large ones, would you prefer 22%?? or 20% or maybe 15.67845623%, you have to draw the line somewhere.
If you have better data going back to 1900, then plenty of people as well as I would love to see it.
Going back to 1980 is a cinch for absolute highs and lows, but that is not the longer term. We can only compare like with like.
In your opinion is not making any type of comparison at all with history a better alternative??
What data IS more useful going back to 1900 for the Australian market??? I have not seen any but would love to.
brty
Let's see if there is any argument with the following examples.
Will ANZ bank will make $1.6B less this year than last year?
Likewise for each of the other banks.
That is what the market is currently pricing in.
I would be interested to see how you arrive at that calculation
1979 The All Ordinaries index was created, with a base date of December 31st 1979, replacing the regional indices, which were independantly run out of the Sydney and Melbourne exchanges.
The thing is, those turkies weren't just bearish, they were naming dates. getting them absolutely wrong, and still claiming the win when "eventually" the market corrected.Just on Oil and Gold, doesn't look like anyone who was bearish was too far wrong now, especially looking at the carnage of the last month. Wouln't you agree?
Especially if your horizon is longer term.....:
RBA can drop rates all it wants but if the credit crunch worsens, the cost of funding for banks will be prohibitive again... Inflation is still well above the 2-3 band, and once the RBA figures out its not slowing, cuts may stall.
skyhawk, I'm still really interested in your justification for your comments on the market direction.I have been reading into the history of this thread and some excellent ideas & posts here. I will be keenly following the comments and ideas made by tech/a and wave picker.
Myis as follows.
RBA can drop rates all it wants but if the credit crunch worsens, the cost of funding for banks will be prohibitive again... Inflation is still well above the 2-3 band, and once the RBA figures out its not slowing, cuts may stall.
Anything can spark a panic. And the financial press will blame it on something completed unrelated. I can see it now "BABY WHALE OUTRAGE CAUSES FINANCIAL MELTDOWN"
I thought our debt importing stemmed from our CAD and Consumption outweighing National Saving (Investment) not from the inability of our banks - sort of by definition we are debt importers - but yeah the credit crisis is definitely not helping things.
Cheap debt is the cause of our CAD and lack of saving, not the other way around.
Tighter credit may be the only thing to fix our problems, but it isn't likely to be pleasant!
And an increase in interest rates will appreciate the AUD, loosely speaking? Imports cheaper, exports more expensive (for foreigners), what effect will this have on the CAD?
Cheap debt also encourages investment, right? Not sure it only encourages people to bid up the price of houses and consume. What does consumption encourage, other than a CAD? And what will this do to the CAD in % of GDP terms?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?