Normal
This is covered, ad nauseam, in almost every single one of his weekly market comments since about 2013. Track records are what they are, and what they are not is a useful basis to dismiss evidence based findings. The painful post GFC track record is the result of things that have nothing to do with the evidence based findings.Here's a WMC devoted purely to the topic of his track record:http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc140512.htm
This is covered, ad nauseam, in almost every single one of his weekly market comments since about 2013. Track records are what they are, and what they are not is a useful basis to dismiss evidence based findings. The painful post GFC track record is the result of things that have nothing to do with the evidence based findings.
Here's a WMC devoted purely to the topic of his track record:
http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc140512.htm
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.