- Joined
- 22 November 2010
- Posts
- 3,661
- Reactions
- 11
Would love to see some broker statements of this, even with the tickers blanked out. If you are doing this consistently without losers then it would make you one of the best traders going
Perhaps you've answered my above question here.Joined "The Chartist" in 2007 ish and made allot back, but struggled with work and trading.
Made 13k in 2008 shorting the crash....gave it all back thinking it would continue to get worse...
Quit work in 2011 and invested 12 months of my life trying to trade intra-day, systematically (-10k)....basically failed....plus the cost of the beginners cycle all over again(20k).
Now I'm back to work...not because i need the money....its because i need the money i can afford to lose. Plus a very convincing head hunter.
Could I ask the same question as I asked Canoz above, i.e. was that money you were happy to lose?I blew 3 $10K accounts and spent more on seminars etc.
... treating it as a big game, which I probably shouldn't, but it's a great learning process for me. ...
... Risk by its very definition is being exposed to a possible negative outcome.
...
* Stupidest can be heard and seen everywhere, but it's wrong. (Please don't ask me to roll out my entire exposition on why finding a word in a modern dictionary doesn't make it legitimate, standard English. Paul and I have already paddled across that ocean several times.)Stupid is just like lucid (same -id ending). The comparative form is more lucid, and the superlative form is most lucid. Likewise, the comparative form of stupid is more stupid, and the superlative form is most stupid.
Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_stupidest_a_word#ixzz28cAAUvLb ...
I like these loser threads because they get the closest to the right approach.
Risk by its very definition is being exposed to a possible negative outcome.
You can’t be successful if you don’t take on risk.
You can only do two things to control risk.
1) Take risk on when it’s priced favourably. (according to your strategy)
2) Managing the negative outcomes.
Do these two things and you will have a positive expectancy - All that remains is to be exposed to risk for long enough for any negative randomness to be overcome by your expectancy and you have a plan to win.
Lots of people talk about an edge but I suspect some don’t actually understand what it is – Its whatever address 1) above. Generally there’s not much to do with an edge after you have worked yours out except, scan/wait until your criteria is met, and then take a position.
After nailing down 1) The real work of being in the market is 2) managing negative outcomes (the positive takes care of itself) and that means being immersed in your mistakes. I know personally that I spend so much time concentrating on managing negative outcomes that it generally comes some what as a shock when the big picture is tallied up – all of which that leads me to the clip below which sums it all up for me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45mMioJ5szc
Loved your clip!... all of which that leads me to the clip below which sums it all up for me.
He only fails twice before he succeeds.
You think!! ...
Canoz
No obligation to answer the question, and I don't mean to be intrusive, but did you put that $20K+ into the CFDs thinking "it's all profit, so I don't care if I lose it"?
Or did you consider doing something safe with at least some of the profit before risking the rest?
Perhaps you've answered my above question here.
You seem to have had a pattern of not holding on to profits. I guess that's fine if it's just play money.
Do you think you'd take a different approach if you were dependent on what you could generate from your trading/investing to live on?
Could I ask the same question as I asked Canoz above, i.e. was that money you were happy to lose?
I'm a bit puzzled about the situation where you start off with $10K and just watch it being lost right to the bottom. Was this before you had the stop losses referred to below in place?
I might be completely misunderstanding what you were doing.
... The answer for me was to go back and test / sim to death methods and understand the why and when they work.
A winner is a loser who never gives up!
A winner is a loser who never gives up!
Aren't they also called gamblers?
Aren't they also called gamblers?
Ayrton Senna gambled with his life.
At age 34 he had his first losing bet.
He is not remembered for gambling.
He is a three times world champion!
Ayrton Senna gambled with his life.
At age 34 he had his first losing bet.
He is not remembered for gambling.
He is a three times world champion!
Ayrton Senna da Silva (pronounced [aˈiɾtõ ˈsenɐ da ˈsiwvɐ] ( listen); 21 March 1960 – 1 May 1994) was a Brazilian racing driver who won three Formula One world championships. He was killed in an accident while leading the 1994 San Marino Grand Prix.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?