A new university study has found profits are likely to rise under a female management team because women are more intuitive and can better suppress negative emotions.
The study, conducted by the Centre for Neuro psychology at Melbourne's Swinburne University, found women who had higher emotional intelligence and intuition were more likely to display good leadership traits.
Women were best able to articulate a clear vision for the future and could better control their feelings and understand the emotions of others.
So there you have it folks. Let the women do their thing and we men can take a back seat for awhile. It can't hurt afterall, look at the mess we are in now !
YMBFJ (well, not you but the article re the bit in bold).
Here is truth:
Women can be good managers as they are well equipped to balance multiple disciplines to achieve a multitude of desired outcomes simultaneously. Women are great communicators in the worldly sense.
Most women can process lots of information in an orderly fashion that leaves
most men for dead. The myth that only women can multi-task is rubbish but I believe women have a real advantage in comprehending lots at once.
A fundamental disadvantage for women in the business world is that business is geared by men, for men.
I don't subscribe to the cries of the feminazis who say that men are exclusive of women in the workplace, but the business world is what has been created... by men.
Women, speaking very honestly, have sufficient skills to run most any business well. They have the natural ability to co-ordinate and
deliver a result. What most lack is the comprehension of the environment in which they seek to flourish.
A smart woman needs to know when to shut her mouth.
The comment above would likely trigger all sorts of fallout in the feminist ranks but for those women smart enough, it will echo the learnings they have already made along the way.
Men conduct business in a very orderly fashion. Take your last meeting for example, man A speaks whilst everyone else listens, then man B has his turn. Each other male at the meeting listens and interjects at a socially acceptable pause or end of thought.
Each man digests what is being said by the sole speaker and responds accordingly. Pretty simple... and the meeting sounds well ordered. The exact same applies to men in social situations - one speaks, the rest listen.
Now think about the white noise a man hears when a group of women start talking in a social situation. Somehow, miraculously, every woman speaks at once (or close to) and everyone hears what has been said.
I believe it is bred into women (perhaps where there was 10 sitting around a fire cooking Pterodactyl) to function in a world that has a lot going on at once. Men on the other hand, were bred to focus on what's infront of them only, perhaps killing a tasty Diplodocus
:.
A woman in a meeting full of men who tries to converse as she would normally do with other women will be viewed as a rude, impetuous scatterbrain by the men at the table. She may well know that she is across the conversation/s but men inately perceive her to be an idiot because she just interrupts and doesn't listen.
Finding women in business who conduct themselves like a man is rare but when I do happen upon one, I am very wary [for want of a better word]. If she's smart enough to know how to properly interact with a group of men and can reason in "man language" then she is no fool - and men
will respond to her as a shrewd peer.
Leadership is another question and whilst women can make great managers, the opportunity for women to make
great leaders is not quite so available yet. Maybe it's a man/ego thing but ultimately most men will trust other men to be right..... it's not sexist, when the status quo is what it is, it is what it is.
So, in this long winded post I am suggesting that YES, "man savvy" women are very well equipped to succeed in business.
The only bit missing is the ability to figure stuff out..... if they start building decks we are all screwed