Dona Ferentes
Pengurus pengatur
- Joined
- 11 January 2016
- Posts
- 16,363
- Reactions
- 22,341
It is interesting, to me at least, that one of the narratives associated with the potash story, and especially BHP committing to Jensen project with its 100+ year lifespan, was the comment that the move to plant based will necessitate a lot more fertiliser.1 year on almost to the day from last post, this has come back to mind.
Lupins, plant protein, sustainable farming, crop rotation etc seasonal benefit?
Chart seems to have consolidated out, no idea on current company fundamentals though, however, from a different aspect, it would seem producers of plant proteins are buying all raw product available, an undersupply situation.
Watching out of interest only.
I've dipped my toe in for a small amount.
Consolidated chart, Graincorp at all time highs, figured this might have another day in the sun, or three?
View attachment 130352
1 year on almost to the day from last post, this has come back to mind. Lupins, plant protein, sustainable farming, crop rotation etc seasonal benefit?
Chart seems to have consolidated out, no idea on current company fundamentals though, however, from a different aspect, it would seem producers of plant proteins are buying all raw product available, an undersupply situation.
as was I , and will remain so.Watching out of interest only.
WOA has lost most of that mid-2020 leg up; now back to 54cWatching out of interest only.
Yes, quite often the marketing (I think transport as well) is called selling expenses. It's not part of COGS because technically marketing and shipping is not actually required to 'make the goods' its only required to 'sell the goods'. I could be wrong here, but I think for example if you were buying and then reselling those goods then shipping and marketing might make their way into the COGS. (I'm sure the internet has the answer!)Share price has slid to $0.19/share for the end of the year - the numbers from the annual report don't look good. It's hard to see the unit economics working in their favour for quite some time unless there is some underlying operational leverage I can't see.
They've burnt $5m in cash in the last 6 months with $14.6m forecast by Q1 23 end. Current MC of $25m against net assets of $19m of which the majority is cash/inventory is interesting.
Question - wouldn't 'Selling Expenses' form part of COGS? unless they mean marketing?
View attachment 151058
Indeed.Whoa.
Likewise, stock code TBA in similar situation/dilemma ?Indeed.
Voluntary suspension to clarify the last announcement.
They hope to have it announced before the end of the financial year.
Apparently, this kind of behaviour is acceptable from a listed company.
Are you sure they said that?It is interesting, to me at least, that one of the narratives associated with the potash story, and especially BHP committing to Jensen project with its 100+ year lifespan, was the comment that the move to plant based will necessitate a lot more fertiliser.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?