- Joined
- 27 June 2010
- Posts
- 4,203
- Reactions
- 329
2 profit warnings since IPO is pretty bad.
2nd profit warnings within about 7 days... that is surely a record?!
2 profit warnings since IPO is pretty bad.
2nd profit warnings within about 7 days... that is surely a record?!
What do they use for planning and scheduling? Pen and paper?
How do they transport the cattles to the ship? Billy Crystal? Or Russell Crowe the Drover?
SKC - your cracking me up today!
Are you sure you didn't slip some of MXC product into your morning coffee?
For the record attempt, they have somewhat flagged that they may break it by downgrading again within the next few weeks.
Not expensive now that it has plummeted to ~40c but the balance sheet shows debt is now larger than market cap - not a great stat to own.
Here's the thing... there is probably nothing fundamentally wrong with the business. They buy cows, prep them then ship them. How hard can it be. That is their business for many many decades. Sometimes they make more, sometimes they make less. Sometimes they do it efficiently, sometimes they lag behind schedule a bit. Sounds like a normal business.
But when you have these in a listed business, where analysts care about forecasts and investors care only about next half's earning... you create a highly volatile share price.
financial covenants stipulate interest be covered 2 times by earnings.
Vietnam is their second biggest customer, so the present animal rights furore could adversely affect them.
Wellard bought or leased five transporters, including the world's largest purpose-built livestock carrier. The company can ship 60,000 cattle or 224,000 sheep from Fremantle, Townsville and Darwin to just about anywhere in the world, meaning Wellard can't be squeezed by the shipping companies hired by exporters which charge $US10,000 to $US50,000 a day.
One of the skills of shipping cattle and sheep is finessing pick-up and delivery schedules. If a customer, such as a food producer in Kuwait, wants 20,000 sheep to arrive a few weeks later than originally agreed, an exporter may have to renegotiate access to a transport ship.
Shipping owners, dominated by the 120-year-old Dutch Vroon group, are adept at exploiting last-minute changes to jack up lease rates. Wellard avoided this problem by taking out long-term leases and building ships. The latest, the nine-deck Ocean Shearer, joined the fleet a few months ago.
None of its Australian competitors own ships and Wellard promoted the fleet as a key advantage over rivals. "Vessel ownership provides flexibility to take advantage of higher margin opportunities," the prospectus said.
But the strategy wasn't cheap. Wellard's latest ship, the Ocean Shearer, was built in China for about $US90 million. A single shipment of around 20,000 cattle is roughly worth $20 million.
...
Developing economies are buying more beef, but growth isn't rapid. Global beef consumption grew 1.1 per cent a year from 2004 to 2014.
Squeezed bulls
Paradoxically, a boom in cattle prices was bad news for Wellard investors.
After a few years of little rain that depleted cattle herds in Queensland, many graziers decided to build up their stocks instead of selling.
With little supply available, the price skyrocketed. The Eastern Young Cattle Indicator beef benchmark hit $7.26 a kilogram last month, its highest ever.
Operating large ships it couldn't afford to leave empty, Wellard desperately needed cattle. It became the most aggressive buyer in the market, according to three industry sources, and would offer 5 to 15 per cent more than its competitors, one of those sources said.
...
In Indonesia, China and elsewhere, consumers aren't wealthy and couldn't afford to pay more for cattle from Australia. The company couldn't pass on its price increases to its customers, the industry sources said, and was forced to accept lower profit margins.
Wellard was caught in the classic traders' squeeze: forced to buy from reluctant wholesalers and sell to price-sensitive consumers.
Interesting write up about the WLD saga in the AFR today.
Read more: http://www.afr.com/markets/equity-m...ons-for-ceo-ubs-20160913-grfel8#ixzz4KeluY1gx
High fixed cost base, leverage and an controversial industry. Not exactly where you want to put your money!
Am I reading that correctly that they actually take ownership of the cattle? So they're not really a transport business like I assumed, but a transport business with additional capital risk. And shipping to poor countries? What if the destination buyer doesn't pay?? Is there a big credit risk here?High fixed cost base, leverage and an controversial industry. Not exactly where you want to put your money!
High fixed cost base, leverage and an controversial industry. Not exactly where you want to put your money!
WLD now my largest holding, own it across all 3 portfolios and largest holing in all 3, im rolling the dice on this one.
What do you think is an appropriate price target for WLD? Also any ideas why it jumped 25% today out of the blue.
What do you think is an appropriate price target for WLD? Also any ideas why it jumped 25% today out of the blue.
Am I reading that correctly that they actually take ownership of the cattle? So they're not really a transport business like I assumed, but a transport business with additional capital risk. And shipping to poor countries? What if the destination buyer doesn't pay?? Is there a big credit risk here?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?