This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Will Craig Thomson finally give us some relief?

Yes Doc and it is not going too well for him ATM.
Not well at all.


http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...-entertainment-court-told-20140122-318r9.html
 

Richo was on the ball and commenting from out of politics was the most honest in what was said. Tash also clearly realised the score, but her defence of the theatre of Craig Thomson's speech in the House of Reps at that time is now condemning of the overall credibility of the majority there at that time. I'm sure that wasn't the intention.
 
This late last week from the AFR is also interesting,


http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/201...-gillard-but-not-about-craig-ok.html#comments

http://www.afr.com/p/national/labor_blocked_damning_evidence_release_jRsSk7GlMn6EbBGWOg5ujP
 
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-...3a-court-told-no-one-else-could-have-/5222554

Craig Thomson fraud trial: Prostitute's witness statement reveals union official was 'regular client'

A prostitute has revealed former Labor MP Craig Thomson was a "regular client" who always had a glass of champagne waiting for her.

In witness statements tended to the Melbourne Magistrates Court this evening, the escorts describe being shocked when the charges against Thomson made national headlines.

One prostitute who used the name Misty says she met the then-national secretary of the Health Services Union (HSU) on at least six occasions and provided sexual services.

"I have seen him on TV and in the media deny that he used the services of prostitutes," she said in her statement.

"He is lying and I am in no doubt that the Craig I performed a number of sexual services for over a period of time is Craig Thomson the politician."

She said she noticed he did not wear a wedding ring.

Her statement recalls how Thomson would always have a glass of champagne ready and often paid to extend her services, sometimes just to chat.

The court earlier heard there was a matrix of evidence that showed it was Thomson and no-one else who misused union credit cards.

Thomson faces 145 criminal charges of obtaining financial advantage and property by deception.

The charges relate to Thomson's alleged spending of HSU funds on brothels, escorts, pornography and other personal expenses while he was national secretary between 2002 and 2007.

He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

In closing arguments, prosecutors told the court that masses of evidence, including receipts phone records and bank statements, show that Thomson used HSU credit cards to spend thousands of dollars on escorts, brothels and pornography.

Using a specific event in Sydney in May 2005, prosecutors say records show Thomson checking into the Westin Hotel where phone calls were made from his room to an escort agency.

The court heard that $770 was charged to the union credit card later that night.
 
How are the last threads of the defence looking ?


That closing argument will require some interesting gymnastics.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-...3a-court-told-no-one-else-could-have-/5222554
 
There are some strange people in this world...
 
I doubt he'll get the slammer. Good behaviour bond probably
That would be seen as a miscarriage of justice in the eyes of the public, especially given his former public profile and his denials, both inside and outside the parliament.
 
I'm of the view that Craig Thomson himself should be hauled up before Parliament to apologise.

http://www.news.com.au/national/pri...pport-from-labor/story-fncynjr2-1226836427057
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...