- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 13,129
- Reactions
- 19,312
Same here but I nearly find my 42 acres too small..Probably too near from the big smoke to be at its best, but beat the suburbs by a mile...Not my mistake !
I bought 40 acres outside a major regional centre 20 years ago and it's been fantastic.
.
A small amount of lawn around the house is fenced off and mowed with a ride on, the sheep have access to the rest and keep it chewed down.
Same here but I nearly find my 42 acres too small..Probably too near from the big smoke to be at its best, but beat the suburbs by a mile...
the distance buffer with barking dogs, crying kids and true blue aussies entertaining.What are you not growing on there that it's too small?
the distance buffer with barking dogs, crying kids and true blue aussies entertaining.
I need a few km radius!!!!
Man you're spoilt
My neighbours are only a couple metre away, sometime they're right on their fence smoking or BBQ each week right next to the window. Have to close the entire side windows.
The other neighbour's kid got a sport car complete with sport exhaust, and also a motobike he doesn't use but once a week switch it on for a few minutes at 8 or 9PM... just because he can. Add the big carport they have and concrete all round really add to the surround sound effect.
But then we got a couple dogs that bark at everything so that kind of even it out by their book.
Man you're spoilt
But then we got a couple dogs that bark at everything so that kind of even it out by their book.
and you wonder why your neighbours make the noises and have the activities they do?
What about China building islands in the first place. .
Drilling platforms?
The hypocritical Chinese are at it again.
China expresses anger at US warship entering South China Sea, sends own destroyers in response
http://www.news.com.au/technology/i...yers-in-response/story-fnpjxnlk-1227584826436
What about China building islands in the first place. Flexing their economic power.
China cares about China and nothing else, they are not a good world citizen.
Good on the USA telling them to get nicked (fu...d).
As usual, students of history will be able to evaluate recent developments through the correct contextual lens.
I presume you mean "preferred" contextual lens, as I am unaware of a consensus among serious historians on any geopolitical issue, thus proving that everything is viewed through the preferred filters of the viewer.
lol. While I don't really condone the expansionist Chinese island building, let's be honest here, the US is in those waters protecting US interests and those of their satellites, hypocritical for them to act like they have any sort of moral high ground or that this is is merely them acting as the benevolent World Police.
As usual, students of history will be able to evaluate recent developments through the correct contextual lens, while others just lap up whatever crap the media is feeding on any given day.
Do yourself a favour and don't let yourself get whipped into a frenzy, think critically for yourself.
If we were to be invaded, I think I 'd prefer the USA doing it.
Yea I know. No need to learn a new language or how to use chopsticks.
Or plant rice, drone work on a production line, inhaling unmitigated pollution, eating pets, looking after the parents like for ever .....
I mean nothing of the sort. Start here and work your way through the references, assuming you actually care about the topic and not merely bringing up some trite point about how it's all relative or whatever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?