- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 850
US probably pushed for that to be published. There has been a distinct shift against China in certain media. Gotta wonder if our government was given the hard word.Perfect.
China's Communist Party seeks news influence through Australian media deals
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-...-seeks-news-influence-australia-deals/8607754
Not only will you be getting bullsh#t from the Australia media but you will be getting bullsh#t from China as well.
Now comes crunch time.
China cannot, at present, match American military or economic might. But it doesn't really need to.
It simply try to make peace [buy off] neighbours it hasn't yet need to help liberate... decide which ones is ripe for picking... and decide where are the weak points in American defences and offence capability to strike at or challenge without serious resistance from the US or anyone. Say, taking over the entirety of the South China Sea.
Then there's the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. That's one of the main thing that managed to not bankrupt the US imperial machine: just print more money.
There has to be reason China is buying $h++ loads of Gold, maybe when the dust settles and the GFC becomes a non toxic topic, China may suggest the best way forward is to re establish a Gold standard.
All hypothetical, and I don't own gold or gold shares, but there is definitely a little bit of smoke.
Yea, it's a bit strange all these fiat currency.
I guess I should know why free floating money is a good thing but I never really understand why it's a good thing.
If money is not backed up by gold but by the promise of the US [and respective country's] treasurer... you have got to keep people's faith that your currency wouldn't be supplanted by another country's currency. Else it'll be worth as much, or less, than the paper it's printed on.
Not sure how serious or accurate this other analysis from former US chief of staff to Colin Powell is, but saw an interview where he said that one of these days when the US threaten to sanction another country, they'll just shrugged and go trade with China, or Russia. Maybe not Russia unless it's for oil and Vodka
I remember reading a bio by the founder of Sony. He describe how back in the 50s and 60s, goods from Japan were considered cheap rubbish. Didn't take them long to ramp up the quality and manufacturing know-how.
China is, from memory, already leading the world in solar panel manufacturing [and usage]. With those billions, and that's about to grow given the rescinding of that one-child policy just recently... that and their growing influence now and from the funding and management of those ports, rail, roads, grids around the world... what China adopts might be the new standard for future industries.
That is why Trump is pushing like hell, to crank up U.S production and penalise U.S companies off shoring production.
He has the right idea, but it is difficult in a capitalist system, to stop manufacturers from seeking the lowest labour costs.
This is where China has it all over the U.S, in a communist economy, it doesn't have the same outcome drivers.
All China wants to do, is get people working, whether it is profitable or not is secondary. Once you have the masses working, you can introduce taxation and increase the cost of the product.
They are starting from an extremely low cost base, compared to western countries, therefore the amount of money they can pour into product development and improvement is huge.
As you say it is much like Japan in the sixties, Jap $hit in 1962 turned into Honda 4 motor bikes and Honda Civics in the late 1960's, then came the Kwaka 9's.
The rest is history, now Chinese go to Japan to buy electrical goods, they don't look for made in U.K or made in U.S.
If history repeats Pax Romana, Pax Brittannica and now Pax Americana will keep China from the top rung for a while yet.
500years of Anglo Saxon "white man's " burden ain't over yet.
China has really never been a warring nation, they built a wall to discourage Mongolian incursions, slowly and under the radar would be their option.IMO
http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/chafta/fact-sheets/pages/key-outcomes.aspx
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?