Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,687
- Reactions
- 10,277
Chart from the above article:Stock Market Seasonality
Bull Markets, by Troy, November 23, 2018: https://bullmarkets.co/stock-market-seasonality/
..To understand seasonality factors such as the Santa Claus Rally, we need a benchmark to compare it against. Here’s the random probability of the stock market (S&P 500) going up on any given month, from 1950 – present..
January: +1.03%
February: +0.04%
March: +1.17%
April: +1.45%
May: +0.26%
June: -0.03%
July: 1.08%
August: -0.05%
September: -0.46%
October: +0.79%
November: +1.52%
December: +1.65%
Technical analysis provides some rationality, in relation to market action.
Fundamental analysis is useless.
I cannot see the ASX which is where a significant amount of my funds rested advancing beyond 6400.
Thus by the end of this week I will totally in cash.
I may even buy myself an ice-cream.
gg
Could pop to new highs beyond pre-GFC high on asx, but good to have a tiny Gold exposure too IMO in case things go south...Gold's strength is not send a good signal, among a host of other things. Party is over? Or are we just taking a breather?
I'm ok with having views on the mkt but I can't fathom ever being 100% out. If you are bearish be 50/50 or something but in my experience the biggest risk to under performance is being too defensive.
Each to their own and manage your plan I guess
Could pop to new highs beyond pre-GFC high on asx, but good to have a tiny Gold exposure too IMO in case things go south...
Other non income producing categories are non blue chip shares, cash, bonds at very low interest, cash in banks, etc. The advantage of gold and silver is that they have low downside risk and keep pace with inflation. All other assets at in a massive bubble. Give me gold and silver in the hand any day in this market. This rigged market!If you traded it then gold is income producing (well, capital gains but that’s effectively the same).
If you’re only aiming to earn a few %
“interest” then you wouldn’t need to be a particularly great trader to get that so long as you can produce a some level of profit.
Just a thought.
kid, to clarify for the stocks long-only crowd, as a trader, youre referring to being always in-market in both directions (long n short) ?
important distinction
and if a player is technically bent (versus f/a) it's strange to see someone be so negative without seeing a great opportunity on the sell-side
liquidity is always moving both ways and creates constant mean-reversion gaps , so does that imply the OP is really just displaying a "this can't go any further" bias and using t/a as a mask for that fear?
Has the OP simply just reached the limit of their bias where the itch can't be scratched ?
It wouldnt be the first time you have been right GGI know it seems extreme, it's all just about done.
I just have a gut feeling that we have hit the highs for the present and that a major correction looms probably commencing in Europe or the US. And yes, I know the US economy is doing well.
I've been lucky mostly in life and if I'm wrong it won't be the end of the world for me.
gg
The housing bust is 75% through IMO.When the first negative GDP quarter hits -
1: The ASX takes a massive swing up?
2: The ASX muddles along sideways.
3: The ASX falls 50 to 100 points that day and down maybe 150 for the week.
Im going 3
The market simply cannot rally into falling GDP and a shrinking domestic economy, and then there's the housing bust.
I think like Gold, Bonds can also be a small part of a portfolio that can withstand the good and bad times of the economy. They provide steady income without the big swings in price.
The US bonds could be the exception IMHO so I won't touch them. Things may look OK now in these, but one day when the ballooning US multi-trillion dollar US Govt debt hits a critical mass, could they turn to 'junk bond' status ?
I knew you'd say that VC, but the current situation is they keep kicking the can down the road. In other words they only pay their re-payment of debt obligation while the principal keeps growing due to spending. Because they have the printing press they print whatever the number they need to meet the trillions required for the payment and they can keep doing it especially while the interest rate is kept low. The debt keeps growing though, you probably know that the congress argue back and forth and then give in to any drastic fiscal measures and just lift the debt ceiling each time.I don’t think the USA will ever default on their bonds, there is no need, they can just print more money, the bonds are payable in US dollars, and they control the printing press.
So that makes the risk of government bonds not a default risk, but an inflation risk.
but an inflation risk
engineers/architects have very little work on
I knew you'd say that VC, but the current situation is they keep kicking the can down the road. In other words they only pay their re-payment of debt obligation while the principal keeps growing due to spending. Because they have the printing press they print whatever the number they need to meet the trillions required for the payment and they can keep doing it especially while the interest rate is kept low. The debt keeps growing though, you probably know that the congress argue back and forth and then give in to any drastic fiscal measures and just lift the debt ceiling each time.
Is that the sort of place you'd want to park any of your money in? You've partially answered this question too in saying:
At some point if inflation get's out of control they have a lever called interest rates to reign it in with. What happens to their debt re-payments under a high interest rate environment?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?