Hey,
Just wanted to throw out a general question asking who trades fulltime and what they like to trade. First off i am under no illusion that i can trade fulltime. I just often wonder what other traders are doing and how some of the more successfull traders are going about their trading day and if they are making a living quite nicely or if they have given it a crack and foundout it is harder then they first thought. When i was a kid i used to love watching basketball videos and seeing basketballers train and play games etc. These guys would be the best of the best and sometimes seeing these videos kind of inspired me and gave me an understanding of what these guys might do everyday to maintain their professional level. I would find it very interesting (believe it or not) to read a bit about a fulltime trader's daily schedule and whether they are enjoying their trading profession and what instruments and methods they like to play around with.
Thanks in advance.
I trade full-time and really enjoy doing so. Making consistent profits. I also have a part-time job on the side, just keeps me in the workforce loop if you know what I mean.
I day-trade so I wake up early, reserach, reasearch, research, then trade as the market opens. I love what I do as I don't like being around people too much so it suits my personality.
I use lots of charts and stock dicussion boards as my research tools, along with newspapers, magazine and tv of course
How long you been full time?
I chat on the internet full time. Trading is a sideline.
It would be interesting to see the amount of time put in and how it is applied:
Who trades full time;
What they trade;
How they go about their day;
Are they making a living out of it or otherwise;
Their daily schedule;
Whether they are enjoying themselves; and
Instruments and methods used.
No offence, but I think the question - which is a common one - is the wrong one.
Better would be "who is able to derive a living from the market?"
If you have a reasonable level of invested capital, you don't need to "trade full time".
If, on the other hand, you only have a small available capital, then much more intensive activity is likely to be needed to pull a living.
If you have enough capital you could "derive a living" from a bank account.
But there is perhaps an in between, where a portfolio is actively managed but not traded. I would say this is where I am at the moment, but this is only one source of income for me and more about building wealth through reinvestment than paying the bills.
I would love to hear more about those who wrest their livings from the markets
No offence, but I think the question - which is a common one - is the wrong one.
Better would be "who is able to derive a living from the market?"
If you have a reasonable level of invested capital, you don't need to "trade full time".
If, on the other hand, you only have a small available capital, then much more intensive activity is likely to be needed to pull a living.
But when the market is moving side ways like the past two weeks it is like watching grass grow.
No offence, but I think the question - which is a common one - is the wrong one.
Better would be "who is able to derive a living from the market?"
If you have a reasonable level of invested capital, you don't need to "trade full time".
If, on the other hand, you only have a small available capital, then much more intensive activity is likely to be needed to pull a living.
I don't know why retail traders avoid using the term "professional" trader. If you make a living from something, you're a professional.Reservation of the term for institutional traders is a nonsense IMO.
If you clip poodles for a living, you're a professional poodle clipper.
That way the amount of time spent becomes irrelevant.
If you have enough capital you could "derive a living" from a bank account.
No offence, but I think the question - which is a common one - is the wrong one.
Better would be "who is able to derive a living from the market?"
If you have a reasonable level of invested capital, you don't need to "trade full time".
If, on the other hand, you only have a small available capital, then much more intensive activity is likely to be needed to pull a living.
To the last point, yes, that's a rational strategy.I think this is a good point actually and you would need much more capital simply to make a living through the interest on a bank account than you would to make a living via dividends on a pile of shares coming in every quarter. And if you have sufficient capital in a stock then on the days when your shares jump high you can sell a certain amount that equates with the amount gained, pocket the cash and still retain the original sum invested, no?
Thanks for raising a really important point. Not every personality is suited to being alone with a computer, minus human interaction.On another note, I would caution against too much excitement on the prospect of "trading full time" from your own home or office. Having worked in an occuption that allowed me to spend a lot of time at home I can say that being cut off from the workforce does weird things to a man (or woman, no doubt). I know a very successful day trader who packed it in to work FT in the workforce just for the company and just trade on the side to keep up the skills and knowledge.
Not really. I originally got into the share market with profits from real estate investments plus simple rigorous saving.I think no one who can make a living from a bank account will be satisfied with an income from the bank account, or could have accumulated the amount required to in the first place.
The only way for this to be a real scenario is through inheritance or winning the lotto imo.
Perhaps the OP could clarify this. I'd say "full time trading", as in the original question, implies no other income is being derived, therefore you'd have to infer the need to derive a full time living from the market. If you were full time trading (or investing or whatever) when are you going to have time to earn a living by any other means?But "derive a living from the market" is off the mark. I think the OP was interested in the daily workings of a retail trader who derive income from trading.
You nearly had me there,Agree time is irrelevant. But I wouldn't classify myself as professional. For starters if I am professional I would need to pay more for market data! The difference to me is whether someone else pay you to do what you do. A poodle clipper presumably got paid by the clients... If some one pays me to trade I am a professional trader, if I trade my own capital I am a retail trader.
Agree time is irrelevant. But I wouldn't classify myself as professional. For starters if I am professional I would need to pay more for market data! The difference to me is whether someone else pay you to do what you do. A poodle clipper presumably got paid by the clients... If some one pays me to trade I am a professional trader, if I trade my own capital I am a retail trader.
That's a can of worms. As Wayne points out, there are many ways to define "professional". My own definition would be a combination - someone successful, skilled and approaches their work with a professional attitude. I imagine the original intention of the term "professional trader" was used to separate the chaff from the wheat, rather than institutional and retail traders.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?