tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,447
- Reactions
- 6,477
i know what u mean, but im sure some of the above indicators gives more false signals than others. so all things being equal, why wouldn't u pick the one that has the least probability of errors?
i know what u mean, but im sure some of the above indicators gives more false signals than others. so all things being equal, why wouldn't u pick the one that has the least probability of errors?
I was talking about intraday. You often see a Bar on a 1 min chart go from a change of trend possibility right up to the last 10 sec only to reverse and end up looking like a bad idea all of a sudden. Sucking more traders into the opposite direction of the trend. This example is of the SPI today at 10:22.
but if i compliment it with the breakout of important resistance and support when there's a huge increase in volume, won't that suppose to increase the chances of profit.
NO.
The indicator is giving you a lagging signal from the last 7, 14, 21 whatever bars, it will not tell you what is going to happen to the next 7, 14, 21 whatever bars.
that's why i need a mentor to guide me, i dun understand stuff, but i want to(without learning the hard way)
That's correct. If they look promising, to the watchlist they go. And that's all the bands are for.Lets take CHOPS Bollinger Bands.
This is simply a displaced 20 day M/A of the selected Data Array H,L,or Close.
Chops use for finding potential breakouts is valid.
However what they wont tell you when a breakout in EITHER direction occurs is whether its likely to be successful.
Other analysis can help immensley.Infact within 3 bars I'm generally able to get it pretty right one way or the other.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?