Normal
Still haven't got around to reading the paper you posted Basilio, but tend to agree with your sentiments posted that market manipulation is wrong legally and morally.IMO current laws are sufficient w.r.t market manipulation and insider trading. Enforcement is the real issue. Unfortunately it's very a costly and time-consuming process to investigate these sorts of trades, let alone gathering enough evidence to successfully prosecute, which begs the question who pays?It's a trade off that's made and I for one think the markets are transparent and stable enough to not warrant further action at the expense of higher fees and taxes.All depends on your investing/trading strategy though I suppose. Leveraged or small volume high risk plays are the obvious losers.
Still haven't got around to reading the paper you posted Basilio, but tend to agree with your sentiments posted that market manipulation is wrong legally and morally.
IMO current laws are sufficient w.r.t market manipulation and insider trading. Enforcement is the real issue. Unfortunately it's very a costly and time-consuming process to investigate these sorts of trades, let alone gathering enough evidence to successfully prosecute, which begs the question who pays?
It's a trade off that's made and I for one think the markets are transparent and stable enough to not warrant further action at the expense of higher fees and taxes.
All depends on your investing/trading strategy though I suppose. Leveraged or small volume high risk plays are the obvious losers.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
