This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

What is the study of technical analysis?

Maybe Wyckoff was clairvoyant.

Maybe that explains His trading expertise

The Holy Grail will be at bottom ourselves.
Wyckoff wasn't a Wyckoffian ... He was Wyckoff


On the S curve... Humans have reflection.. natural systems don't.

That explains the 1 2 3 elliot overlay.

Or the Wyckoff test and response or shakeouts.

Modis (S curve) talks about precursors The smooth curve gets overbought and oversold and shakes weak hands off with false moves..


Wyckoff defined much of what TA is and has become.

He was born in 1873 .. His Method (The 1930 Course) is still taught today
and has an avid following both by those who have learnt it and those who have it second hand in the many TA books written since..

Bar charts, Point and figure charts, Comparative Relative Strength
trend lines and channel techniques.. Wave charts and on and on..


Only The course itself contains the Method and Snake I think that the reason
It seems like a best kept secret.. Is because it did and does work..


No ones fault when they were born.. But We do stand on the shoulders of those Giants (titans) who went before and in many ways the oringinal formulations are the best and often have the most benefit for our own journey.. In My opinion anyway ....

motorway

A motorwayian

For example John Bollinger (Of the Bands)


In the October 2002 S&C, five historic figures were named as "titans of technical analysis": Charles Henry Dow, R.N. (Ralph Nelson) Elliott, W.D. (William Delbert) Gann, Arthur A. Merrill, and Richard Wyckoff.
 

A question often asked.
In the landscape of market analysis I would say that T/A runs a dismal third.

(1) Guessing,tips,gut hunches,brokers recommendations,reading papers,and Newsletters etc I would say for the public runs no 1---many call this analysis.

(2) Those seriously Fundamental.

(3) Those seriously technical.
BUT.
While there are many who wade through technical analysis VERY FEW actually know how to IMPLEMENT Technical analsysis into a Trading methodology. Often used in isolation with no thought of wether the analysis has merit in the longterm,or even if a group of trades will be profitable---T/A is often given a cursory glance and when it fails to be 100% accurate is seen as voodoo.

There is a VAST chasm between knowledge and application of that knowledge.
Technical analysis demonstrates this better than most!
 
I don't think anyone singularly answered this question correctly but as a collection it was partially answered. What we end up doing is take a section of technical analysis to become proficient at. Maybe because the subject is too broad to know all the intricacies of.

So technical analysis is a broad subject of which books and experience seem to be the main form of education. I don't know of any education course that covers the general field of T/A. This is disappointing.

Wikipedia has a good description of T/A and to study these, though not all listed attributes, is the study of technical analysis. To know the precise workings of the various indicators alone would be part of T/A study.

 
I don't know of any education course that covers the general field of T/A. This is disappointing.
Well there is A.T.A.A. which is the Australian Technical Analysts Association
but for training I believe Kaplan Professional are the only company that offer a professional training course at $1550.00 for a Single Subject as well as Masters and Diplomas for more.
Single Subject course for Technical Analysis ...
* I think there is a way around the "assumed knowledge" requirement as highlighted below.

So there you go. Might be all that is required to assemble the T/A jigsaw puzzle anyone may have in mind.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...