I saw the video. It is clear to me that everyone that caused the damage is on CCTV and can be identified. The question is WHY isn't the Western Australian Police arresting all those perpetrators? When your own Police force doesn't do something then that is the bigger problem. You need to ask the Police why they aren't doing something about it.I don't know if this is the thread to post this item, but it does show how difficult it is to deal with certain groups of people.
The shop owner last week, grabbed a kid who he says steals on a regular basis, the aftermath is quite exciting.
By the way this is an old established suburb of Perth, it isn't in the outback somewhere.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/2...ner-attacker-after-detaining-young-shoplifter
I hope this sort of behaviour doesn't become the norm, it will certainly discourage people from operating shops.
In the face of the current anti white racism, it is not a racist statement, especially when the "perps" are more than happy to state that it is also okay to be black/brown/or whatever.Is this really racism ?
I don't think so.
When people talk of Indigenous cricket tournaments (exclusive by definition) , a simple statement of fact acts as a red flag to the SJW's.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01...ts-ok-to-be-white-banner-at-big-bash/10750974
?The vocal minority at it again, with the support of the 5 minute media.
https://www.smh.com.au/entertainmen...ley-following-racism-row-20190129-p50u9y.html
?
Yumi said "you're sounding quite racist..." and rightly never backed down. Yumi never said KAK was a racist but instead suggested one could join the dots to her spoken words as to the direction KAK was heading down.
Unfortunately KAK began her argument with an unverified claim that the marchers had done "zippo" on issues which were not part of the "invasion Day" theme. To begin, it was in irrelevance.
It was also poor form to blame indigenous communities for poor policing, and worse still to suggest the marchers would be better off policing themselves, which was the implication. It's equivalent to proposing that if I joined any march I should instead be combating domestic violence.
Commentators who lead with their mouth are asking for it to be smacked - not real smart KAK.
Nice to be living in your head rent free, Darcy.Is that all she said "you're sounding quite racist."??? I had 4BC/2GB on yesterday at lunchtime, the Chris Smith show (same guys who had Ian Plimer on his radio program). They were calling for KAK to sue Yumi Stynes. People (like @wayneL. ) were calling in swearing. The biggest beat up I've heard. I thought Yumi Stynes must've alleged KAK was a paedophile or something.
I was more making reference to the way the media, blow up what in reality is a very small issue, I feel the public would be better served by the media highlighting and promoting a positive signal, rather than constantly looking for the opportunity, to highlight the negative aspects of indigenous reality.?
Yumi said "you're sounding quite racist..." and rightly never backed down. Yumi never said KAK was a racist but instead suggested one could join the dots to her spoken words as to the direction KAK was heading down.
Unfortunately KAK began her argument with an unverified claim that the marchers had done "zippo" on issues which were not part of the "invasion Day" theme. To begin, it was in irrelevance.
It was also poor form to blame indigenous communities for poor policing, and worse still to suggest the marchers would be better off policing themselves, which was the implication. It's equivalent to proposing that if I joined any march I should instead be combating domestic violence.
Commentators who lead with their mouth are asking for it to be smacked - not real smart KAK.
While you are having a go at the "whole population" of indigenous Australians, I am going to have a go at your "average" english language skills which allows you to get away with saying some very vague statements.I listen a lot the local aboriginal and country music radio fm here in Brisbane, and there are wonderful positive radio show hosts, but indeed some segments and too many of them are pure victimising rants ,fake history which can only lead to hate and racism, while whole population are kept under welfare and worse in a welfare mentality.if the street is dirty, you clean it.if the house is broken, you repair it..we are first responsible of our own destiny, irrespective of colour or status...
"that what was seen as acceptable behaviour 20 years ago"
I can see the propaganda is working well english is not my native language and i am a dirty invaderWhile you are having a go at the "whole population" of indigenous Australians, I am going to have a go at your "average" english language skills which allows you to get away with saying some very vague statements.
It was not acceptable when viewed from a 2021 perspective I agree but reality is this took place during the 1980's and 90's on a TV show which was extremely entrenched in Australian culture at the time.SP it wasn't acceptable 20 years ago, just the power imbalanced allowed for the cringeworthy behaviour.
Kamahl said he was humiliated that's a bad thing surely?
Yumi didnt want to discuss the data and also went to usual tatic of the moronic left of claiming white privileged card.?
Yumi said "you're sounding quite racist..." and rightly never backed down. Yumi never said KAK was a racist but instead suggested one could join the dots to her spoken words as to the direction KAK was heading down.
Unfortunately KAK began her argument with an unverified claim that the marchers had done "zippo" on issues which were not part of the "invasion Day" theme. To begin, it was in irrelevance.
It was also poor form to blame indigenous communities for poor policing, and worse still to suggest the marchers would be better off policing themselves, which was the implication. It's equivalent to proposing that if I joined any march I should instead be combating domestic violence.
Commentators who lead with their mouth are asking for it to be smacked - not real smart KAK.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?