I support the lower payout ratio of 75% of cash flow.
It should see higher dividends become available in the future, while also lowering debt related risk.
By retaining 25% of cashflow they will have an extra $500M per year to fund the development pipline, Westfields has a history of getting 12%-15%pa return on capital invested into developments / redevelopments so the retained income will translate into higher cashflow in future years meaning larger dividends.
Hopefully they will also use the retained earnings to reduce the gearing levels of debt to sub 30% like some of the Australian based reit's.
If a $0.64 distribution over the next 12 months represents 70-75% of operating income + associated hedging, then the latter is anticipated by the directors to be in the range of $0.91 to $0.85 per stapled security. That compares to $0.94 for the past 12 months.Westfield has announced an estomated distribution of $0.47 payable at the end of Feb. The stock is now trading ex-distribution so anyone who buys now will not get it.
Future distributions will be lower given a change in payout ratio from 100% of operating income + associated hedging to around 70-75%. Expect future half yearly distributions of around $0.35.
"The mentality of uninformed investors", huh?Could be due to the mentality of un-informed investors simply seeing a drop in dividend and thinking that means the company is doing worse rather then understanding its due to a lowering of the payout ratio.
I see it as a positive as well, shows management are taking pro-active steps to continue growth and its investment pipeline. They are under some slight pressure at the moment due to exchange rates and weakness in the US, however as i've mentioned previously as a long term play I have confidence in their ability to provide meaningful growth and income going forward.
Sell downs of this natue just provides an opportunity to obtain a holding at a lower price in a quality company.
it's been trading sideways for some time, didn't enjoy the sharp rally from March 09 that most other stocks experienced, and has now been trading below the MA and in a fairly clear downtrend for the last week.
This always seems to be on the basis of "be patient, and the quality of the company will bring its eventual rewards".
WDC wouldn't make the cut for me on the basis of insufficient capital appreciation. If I don't want to grow my capital, I'd sooner leave the money in the bank.
Well WDC closed today at $11.65, I think there would be ample capital growth over the next 12months, 5years and 10 years that when added to the dividend will create a great longterm investment.
How about you put forward your number one stock pick and we will campare the two in 12 months, just for fun
as far as capital growth is concerned wdc has historically been a stock market super star, I think $1000 invested in westfield holdings when it listed would be worth somthing like $88 million today, I am not saying that will be repeated but the is potential for growth there.
I am buying into WDC as a longterm holding that produces a steady income stream that is naturally hedged against inflation and will grow as the company completes it's development and redevelopment pipeline.
After all it is a property investment so I am not expecting 40%pa returns, but 10%+ should be achieveable, atleast from it's current low base.
. The purchase costs of my wfa equated to $13.50 per wdc and I held them all the way up to the dizzy heights of $21.00+ and all the way back down to $10:30
Even though I had received significant returns in the interim from steady dividends, the lesson learnt was to take the profits on capital gains when the share price is on the rise.
Holding for the "long term" simply means you will ride the rollercoaster up when they go up and will ride the roller coaster down when they go down.
I also had WDC when they converted to the stapled securities. Sold in 06 at only a moderate profit.I can't comment on the long term value garnered by anyone investing in Westfields Initial Public Offering. I can comment though on the shares I held in Westfield America (wfa) that rolled into Westfields Stapled shares (wdc). The purchase costs of my wfa equated to $13.50 per wdc and I held them all the way up to the dizzy heights of $21.00+ and all the way back down to $10:30 (they went down under $9.00 after I bit the bullet).
Even though I had received significant returns in the interim from steady dividends, the lesson learnt was to take the profits on capital gains when the share price is on the rise.
Holding for the "long term" simply means you will ride the rollercoaster up when they go up and will ride the roller coaster down when they go down.
Kermit, good that you can discuss your views in such a reasonable way - it's appreciated.Just because the market is currently very volatile and has been acting on impulse news rather then long term outlooks, I don't think that warrants not being in a company because the market is selling it off. The underlying entity with your own research is what your investing in, not the short-term perception of the market (of course this is in regards to long term core holdings, if your chasing short term spec stocks obviously the market perceptions play a large role).
Again, it doesn't seem to me that I'm an 'aggressive spec investor' when I simply take advantage of a rising share price.It all depends on your investment strategy, but if your looking at a large company like WDC when your aggresive spec investor then obviously your strategy is off point already anyway. As a long term core asset, i think the underlying company is undervalued and over the long term you'd expect that the market realises that (once these tougher times continue to subside and volatility to company announcements lowers).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?