- Joined
- 24 April 2009
- Posts
- 1,114
- Reactions
- 0
It seems that computer technology is constantly improving every few months with faster processors and hardware, yet newer software is constantly demanding more processing power.
Will we ever reach a point where our computers are up and running in a matter of seconds and not the minutes that it takes with vista/win 7 even with the fastest hardware?? (I remember my Win95, 98 computers taking similar amounts of time to boot as my vista comp now, which is at least 20x faster in terms of processing capabilities)
It seems that with any hardware improvements, software demands increase at the same rate, resulting in no net gain...
Why don't you use hibernation? Only 20 secs for my XP to start up.Will we ever reach a point where our computers are up and running in a matter of seconds and not the minutes that it takes with vista/win 7 even with the fastest hardware??
That would be nice and probably the future but for the moment I am happy with these times. Stopwatch used to acquire times.Will we ever reach a point where our computers are up and running in a matter of seconds and not the minutes that it takes with vista/win 7 even with the fastest hardware??
It seems that computer technology is constantly improving every few months with faster processors and hardware, yet newer software is constantly demanding more processing power.
Will we ever reach a point where our computers are up and running in a matter of seconds and not the minutes that it takes with vista/win 7 even with the fastest hardware?? (I remember my Win95, 98 computers taking similar amounts of time to boot as my vista comp now, which is at least 20x faster in terms of processing capabilities)
It seems that with any hardware improvements, software demands increase at the same rate, resulting in no net gain...
Yes I agree it is futile and can be avoided depending on what the computer is used for.
I have had my computer with XP Home OS for 5 years last month and it runs faster than when I bought it. The main reason is because I have a 3 times faster connection speed and the second reason is because I don't have applications a) trying to access websites for automatic updates b) download stuff without my prior consent c) running in the background. Fleas are rampant on the www so I do a registry cleanup on start and periodic virus, malware, trojan, spyware etc. scans.
Christmas wish is a multi-screen arrangement such as what Zenview has to offer.
Christmas wish is a multi-screen arrangement such as what Zenview has to offer.
That's six feet wide all up. You would need to be the same distance away to catch the peripherals. Nah. The triple I was looking at is centre 24" and two 17".
i reckon this one would be the go...http://www.digitaltigers.com/zenview-trio24w.asp
It seems that with any hardware improvements, software demands increase at the same rate, resulting in no net gain...
jono said:you'd be better off buying 3x 24" screens for $250 ea
Wysiwyg said:That's six feet wide all up. You would need to be the same distance away to catch the peripherals. Nah. The triple I was looking at is centre 24" and two 17".
Have you thought about using them in portrait mode? The best setup for a triple monitor system in my opinion, particularly if they're widescreen monitors.
Is that the "Driver Detective" for AUD$40.00Julia, might be worth running "Driver detective" in case a driver has been deleted or corrupted
Unreal. This way will save me a lot of money.Thanks.That setup is easy to do and cheap too. get a Laser 3 monitor stand off ebay for 60 bucks throw a dual head card in your box for 100 and its done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?