- Joined
- 12 December 2005
- Posts
- 544
- Reactions
- 0
That also poses the question why don't workers leave their jobs in droves and become millionaires. I asked myself that, maybe you can enlighten me so I can pass it on to my children.
I'll try to put you on the right track with a couple of important amendments sydboy.Most CEOs are so caught up in what's best for them that they rarely do what's best for the true company owner - the shareholders!
Most union leaders and union dominated Labor governments are so caught up in what's best for them that they rarely do what's best for the true company owner - the taxpayers!
Never Trust Anyone Who Hasn’t Been Punched in the Face
Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't get paid for their work. Email editors@takimag.com to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/never_trust_anyone_who_hasnt_been_punched_in_the_face/print#ixzz2Gh7qpEdN
Walter Bagehot said it well almost 150 years ago:
History is strewn with the wrecks of nations which have gained a little progressiveness at the cost of a great deal of hard manliness, and have thus prepared themselves for destruction as soon as the movements of the world gave a chance for it.
Every great civilization reaches a point of prosperity where it is possible to live your entire life as a pacifist without any serious consequences. Many civilizations have come to the state of devolution represented by modern Berkeley folkways, from wife-swapping to vegetarianism. These ideas don’t come from a hardscrabble existence in contact with nature’s elemental forces; they are the inevitable consequence of being an effete urban twit removed from meaningful contact with reality. The over-civilized will try to portray their decadence as something “highly evolved” and worthy of emulation because it can only exist in the hothouse of highly civilized urban centers, much like influenza epidemics. Somehow these twittering blockheads missed out on what the word “evolution” means. Evolution involves brutal and often violent natural selection, and these people have not been exposed to brutal evolutionary forces any more than a typical urban poodle.
Tony Abbott is a man, a strong man, who wishes the best for his country. He is not an "effete urban twitterer" unlike some of his opponents, and the electorate will come around to his style of leadership when he becomes PM.
Meanwhile, his opponents will excoriate him for being a man.
Is that why they are trying to stop party members from using twitter?
...Pollies shouldn't be on there in the first place. Talk about a time waster
Pollies shouldn't be on there in the first place. Talk about a time waster
The illusion of thinking you are being heard. It just north of a gossip site. Labor wanting to censor the internet and stuffing round with freedom of information laws, media laws etc is more of a threat then libs not twittering to the twit masses.enabling politicians and voters to interact more.
It just north of a gossip site. Labor wanting to censor the internet and stuffing round with freedom of information laws, media laws etc is more of a threat then libs not twittering to the twit masses.
The illusion of thinking you are being heard.
So what are the reasons people would vote for TA as PM??.
I am surprised you find something so simple to be so difficult...
I'd be interest to understand what proof people believe they have that a TA led Govt would be better than the the current one.
To be rid of this sexist, spending and incompetent lot who wrecked our border protection system and have no idea how to fix it. To the best of my knowledge, never before has a PM waved the sexist card so dreadfully.
To be rid of a government which inherited cash in the bank and now left us with a gross debt of around $260 billion (interest approx $12 billion per annum) with very little to show for it.
To get rid of the carbon tax.
The real issue is to put an end to the current stuff-ups regardless of the leader of the libs.
I am surprised you find something so simple to be so difficult...
What proof do you have that a TA lead Govt would have run surpluses over the last 5 years?
What proof do you have that economic refugees wouldn't have flooded Australia over the last 5 years with the old system in place?
What proof do you have that a TA lead Govt
Great post, have had similar thoughts myself.
Yes, I suppose that as an ex-copper you also have an obsession with trying to prove the un-provable.
Give me some some backed up substance on the value of Abbott?
Oh, and the ex cop bit, if you are losing the argument go for the man.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?