Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,690
- Reactions
- 10,288
I cannot find a link, but it was reported in the conservative press today that Abbott, in his response to the Family School Bonus announced in the Budget, said that the money was a carbon tax sweetener. Asked how the payments were different to Howard government handouts, such as the Baby Bonus, he said: "They just are."
Hockey then argued that the payments were "vastly different " from the Baby Bonus because "you have to have a baby" to claim the bonus.
Gillard then reminded those bozos that babies actually grow to become school children.....
Seriously, consider if Abbott wasn't in a position to win the next election by default, which seems a foregone conclusion. Would anyone want a cod-gob like him to be PM? He doesn't really seem capable of earning the job because he is not smart in what he says and what he does.
Obviously there will be replies to this post along the lines of Gillard and her gov't not being very smart along the journey as well. Fair point. But at least, tone notwithstanding, she doesn't say doofus things!
I am sat tonight here in a chilly Canberra in the Hong Hau Restaurant at Kingston, having been privileged to listen earlier to Tony Abbott's Budget in Reply speech in Parliament House.
This is a true Leader, speaking of the future, a bright future for all Australians and not made on cheap handouts to those who could do better in a more vibrant economy.
Gillard looked as if she had swallowed a raw prawn.
ALP staffers agree with their coalition counterparts here tonight that it is just a matter of time before he is PM, and Gillard just history.
gg
Fair criticism. He could have pointed out Costello's premise at the time of the introduction of the baby bonus ("One for Mum, one for Dad, and one for the country") which was based on the need to increase the younger population in order to fund increasing pressures of funding upcoming retirees.I cannot find a link, but it was reported in the conservative press today that Abbott, in his response to the Family School Bonus announced in the Budget, said that the money was a carbon tax sweetener. Asked how the payments were different to Howard government handouts, such as the Baby Bonus, he said: "They just are."
You can't be serious. Consider just the latest one where she very belatedly had Slipper and Thomson stand aside. When asked why she did this, after weeks and weeks of defending both of them, she replied that "a line had been crossed".But at least, tone notwithstanding, she doesn't say doofus things!
Obviously there will be replies to this post along the lines of Gillard and her gov't not being very smart along the journey as well. Fair point. But at least, tone notwithstanding, she doesn't say doofus things!
1 vote Tony was underwhelming in this speech tonight....the overenthusiastic shouts of "hear hear" were a little staged and over done for mine...i got the impression the "team" doesn't really believe in him.
1 vote Tony was underwhelming in this speech tonight....the overenthusiastic shouts of "hear hear" were a little staged and over done for mine...i got the impression the "team" doesn't really believe in him.
The distinction the Coalition could have made is that the baby bonus was introduced at a time of budget surplus.I cannot find a link, but it was reported in the conservative press today that Abbott, in his response to the Family School Bonus announced in the Budget, said that the money was a carbon tax sweetener. Asked how the payments were different to Howard government handouts, such as the Baby Bonus, he said: "They just are."
Hockey then argued that the payments were "vastly different " from the Baby Bonus because "you have to have a baby" to claim the bonus.
Gillard then reminded those bozos that babies actually grow to become school children.....
Seriously, consider if Abbott wasn't in a position to win the next election by default, which seems a foregone conclusion. Would anyone want a cod-gob like him to be PM? He doesn't really seem capable of earning the job because he is not smart in what he says and what he does.
Obviously there will be replies to this post along the lines of Gillard and her gov't not being very smart along the journey as well. Fair point. But at least, tone notwithstanding, she doesn't say doofus things!
I am sat tonight here in a chilly Canberra in the Hong Hau Restaurant at Kingston, having been privileged to listen earlier to Tony Abbott's Budget in Reply speech in Parliament House.
This is a true Leader, speaking of the future, a bright future for all Australians and not made on cheap handouts to those who could do better in a more vibrant economy.
Gillard looked as if she had swallowed a raw prawn.
ALP staffers agree with their coalition counterparts here tonight that it is just a matter of time before he is PM, and Gillard just history.
gg
I cannot find a link, but it was reported in the conservative press today that Abbott, in his response to the Family School Bonus announced in the Budget, said that the money was a carbon tax sweetener. Asked how the payments were different to Howard government handouts, such as the Baby Bonus, he said: "They just are."
Hockey then argued that the payments were "vastly different " from the Baby Bonus because "you have to have a baby" to claim the bonus.
Gillard then reminded those bozos that babies actually grow to become school children.....
Seriously, consider if Abbott wasn't in a position to win the next election by default, which seems a foregone conclusion. Would anyone want a cod-gob like him to be PM? He doesn't really seem capable of earning the job because he is not smart in what he says and what he does.
Obviously there will be replies to this post along the lines of Gillard and her gov't not being very smart along the journey as well. Fair point. But at least, tone notwithstanding, she doesn't say doofus things!
I am extremely distressed by the adverse comments both Eager and So_Cynical have made about Tony Abbott's budget in reply speech. They are partisan replies unfitting of a public forum such as ASF.
I have always been ready to applaud the ALP for good policy and action, the dispatch of Kevin Rudd to the outer, being the only one that comes readily to mind, but I am sure there are some more, and I would be the first to applaud them if there were.
gg
I got the exact opposite impression, he was concise, forceful, a real leader as gg said.
I am extremely distressed by the adverse comments both Eager and So_Cynical have made about Tony Abbott's budget in reply speech. They are partisan replies unfitting of a public forum such as ASF.
I have always been ready to applaud the ALP for good policy and action, the dispatch of Kevin Rudd to the outer, being the only one that comes readily to mind, but I am sure there are some more, and I would be the first to applaud them if there were.
gg
I am extremely distressed by the adverse comments both Eager and So_Cynical have made about Tony Abbott's budget in reply speech. They are partisan replies unfitting of a public forum such as ASF.
I have always been ready to applaud the ALP for good policy and action, the dispatch of Kevin Rudd to the outer, being the only one that comes readily to mind, but I am sure there are some more, and I would be the first to applaud them if there were.
gg
I am extremely distressed by the adverse comments both Eager and So_Cynical have made about Tony Abbott's budget in reply speech.
LOL
May I remind everyone here of my recently completed, peer reviewed PhD thesis "The Impossibility of Objective Leftist Thought"?
:
Agree. He is giving Labor their advertising script with this.The achilles heel remains six months parental leave at full pay, the cost will be passed on to consumers. It's a free kick to Labor.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?