DeepState
Multi-Strategy, Quant and Fundamental
- Joined
- 30 March 2014
- Posts
- 1,615
- Reactions
- 81
IMO, macro, hedge fund type strategies that require a high degree of conviction to hold are best done by... hedge funds who manage OTHER people's money.
For my own money, I prefer a journey requiring less conviction, especially when the positions go against me.
Then again, I don't have a eight-figure sum to invest and worry about. So different horses and courses.
We're off....and having a bad start....erghh I hate this already.
Then I moved on....why is it that some positions are more comfortable to hold when things move against you? Perhaps it occurs when you have some sort of conviction around an underlying valuation. You can get this if this concept is used in equities or certain other assets. Carry/Momentum has no such grounding. If things move against you, they just move against you. There is no reason why the concept just became an even greater bargain. Is this why you feel that this kind of position requires higher conviction, or is otherwise less comfortable, when things move against you?
I think everyone should read the richest man from Babylon. Lots of wisdom in there and certainly should be part of every education (be it formal or informal).
(Just for fun, I don't know a thing about shorting)...ran a couple quick numbers, and from ASX200 came up with for closer inspection - PDN Palladin, BKN Bradken (which went up today, if you like that sort of thing) and PGH Pact Group Holdings.
A talk by Howard Marks at Google on 27 March on "the most important thing". Long but entertaining, bear with it.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6WroiiaVhGo
Really good stuff... I think you will enjoy it DV.
Thx. What abt these made it through your screens For highlighting?
Outright Equity Shorts. Going to create a book.
Thanks. I read his book a couple of years ago and you've prompted me to review my notes again, which I have done just then. He is so clean in his thinking. I enjoy the overlap which I get fron reading different viewpoints. At the intersection of these viewpoonts are just wonderful things.
Really good stuff... I think you will enjoy it DV.
Whilst we're talking about it - what's the idea/thought here?
It was a great video, Falcon, thanks for the link, I read his memos on the Oaktree site but didnt realise he had written a book. Really interesting stuff.
Shorts, as part of a wider investment portfolio, are a field where simple screens can work particularly well (things like Montier's ideas). It appears more likely for a company that screens out as having poor prospects to turn out that way than for the mirror (buying what appear to be good companies). As most of the big end of town are long-constrained mandates or otherwise restricted for issues of liquidity, an opportunity may be available for short sellers who do not have such constraints. Still, it's not exactly money sitting on a streetside gutter for collection.
based on the biggest winners are all over the place (valuation), whereas the losers have a way bigger proportion of "expensive" among them (than random).It appears more likely for a company that screens out as having poor prospects to turn out that way than for the mirror
Hmmm...seems like fun; might have a bit of a look - maybe run a thread.
With shorts, I keep thinking of market state...must've been something I read.
I agree with:
based on the biggest winners are all over the place (valuation), whereas the losers have a way bigger proportion of "expensive" among them (than random).
What's your universe? Do you have a list / index?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?