Normal
Strange that no mention was made of the age of the "child".He could have been 9-16 and 15 year olds these days are more than capable of causing GBH or worse.More selective reporting by the ABC it appears.
Strange that no mention was made of the age of the "child".
He could have been 9-16 and 15 year olds these days are more than capable of causing GBH or worse.
More selective reporting by the ABC it appears.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
