Reply to thread

Well does that give rise to the question, if the aboriginals have never agreed to being Australian citizens under our sovereignty , did they have a right to accept or indeed qualify for welfare?

This is the issue, one can't claim loss, while claiming benefits as result of the loss.

They should be paid for loss of ownership IMO, but that has to be weighed in a sensible manner, as to the gains they have made with regard subsidies, land rights and welfare.

Therefore the city dwellers, if they feel have been disavowed of their land, could return to those lands and re establish that connection.

The ridiculous notion that the Australian population pay forever for immigrating here is ridiculous, as we are encouraging people to immigrate here in massive numbers at the moment, are we warning them that they could be charged an extra fee for moving here?

If not we may well be in breach of our own advertising laws, where all costs have to be shown in the advertising.

As usual it is just another poorly thought out brain fart, that when it is actually worked through, turns to $hit IMO.

 As usual FW's, led by Fw's