Reply to thread

Ha Ha... You are special Sean and not in a good way...

I agreed The Voice was racist  ?   No Sean. That poisonous little ad decided to create a racist and dishonest story to ginger up its supporters. The implication that Mayo was the recipient of $2m ? As far as I can see quite  dishonest.  The Voice movement may be given $2m . Not Mayo.

And with regard to Mayo being a "commie" ?  That is just another one of those poisonous red herrings  in that piece. I noticed that Advance Australia has spent  much energy highlighting any comment Mayo has made that can portray him as having communist sympathies.

Firstly "So what  ? " Are we at the stage where someone can be trashed simply because others can cherry pick comments ?  Well clearly so in this case

Secondly.  I thought this was supposed to be a thoughtful, balanced discussion about the pros and cons of The Voice referendum ? The actual referendum folks,  not simply trying to trash one of the participants and turn it into a food fight.

Going back to Advance Australia's 10 points on why The Voice referendum should be voted down.  I didn't agree with them but I could see how they made a case.  I also noticed how amazingly indigenous friendly they made the document. Lots of smiling, happy mixed families wanting to" go forward together". 

And then when the rubber hits the road they fly their true colours.