Normal
The truth probably is that albo can legislate "the voice" into existence. The reason you put it in the constitution is so it's kind of a perpetual thing. (Advisory/governing bodies have happened before but didn't end well.)But the real risk is if there is an election then liberals can change it.However if Labor can ram it through now then it should all go through before 2025 election. So do Labor and the greens get to choose what will be written or is the lower house sufficient?I'm not really up on constitutional changes.This is where details matter.Is it the usual horse trading that goes on?
The truth probably is that albo can legislate "the voice" into existence. The reason you put it in the constitution is so it's kind of a perpetual thing. (Advisory/governing bodies have happened before but didn't end well.)
But the real risk is if there is an election then liberals can change it.
However if Labor can ram it through now then it should all go through before 2025 election. So do Labor and the greens get to choose what will be written or is the lower house sufficient?
I'm not really up on constitutional changes.
This is where details matter.
Is it the usual horse trading that goes on?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
