Normal
Well it has been sold poorly.So what does that have to do with the point I made? Which was the Government is having trouble articulating it, as even the host of the 'Project' pointed out.If ATSI people aren't or can't do their job, they should be investigated or sacked, adding another section to bypass them supports that.More to the point is there any logic in your points.So would ATSIC, if they actually left Canberra and visited the elders that they are supposed to be representing already.I shouldn't have to, the Government should be able to give the population the confidence and background information required for the population to make an informed decision, there is no way everyone in Australia is going to read the background.That's the Governments job, as I said.
Well it has been sold poorly.
So what does that have to do with the point I made? Which was the Government is having trouble articulating it, as even the host of the 'Project' pointed out.
If ATSI people aren't or can't do their job, they should be investigated or sacked, adding another section to bypass them supports that.
More to the point is there any logic in your points.
So would ATSIC, if they actually left Canberra and visited the elders that they are supposed to be representing already.
I shouldn't have to, the Government should be able to give the population the confidence and background information required for the population to make an informed decision, there is no way everyone in Australia is going to read the background.
That's the Governments job, as I said.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.