Normal
On the contrary - yet again - as Parliament can act on good ideas, and not act on ideas which it deems, for example, not cost effective. That's their prerogative.See above. Or, for example, it may not act where there seems to be contention, or where it deems the level of consultation was superficial. Or, government might have information that renders an idea impractical. There are many reasons why Parliament may not act, or might delay acting immediately, which will be valid.On the contrary - for the umpteenth time. You chose not to respond to claims you made which I know were false, and I said people are being sucked in by such claims. Would you like me to repeat those claims? If anyone makes false claims that others believe then that's dealing directly with substance and not the perpetrator.I expressed my belief, not an opinion.
On the contrary - yet again - as Parliament can act on good ideas, and not act on ideas which it deems, for example, not cost effective. That's their prerogative.
See above. Or, for example, it may not act where there seems to be contention, or where it deems the level of consultation was superficial. Or, government might have information that renders an idea impractical. There are many reasons why Parliament may not act, or might delay acting immediately, which will be valid.
On the contrary - for the umpteenth time. You chose not to respond to claims you made which I know were false, and I said people are being sucked in by such claims. Would you like me to repeat those claims? If anyone makes false claims that others believe then that's dealing directly with substance and not the perpetrator.
I expressed my belief, not an opinion.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
