More distraction.
That sums up you inability to understand the referendum question.
And your answer sums up your inability to comprehend a simple question, and a total inability to answer it.
Someone previously made a point that there weren't any elders that were against the voice. Signatories signed on behalf of the elders because their names were printed on the statement, which was obviously against their will and false, is the way I see it.
Exactly. It's the "soft racism of low expectations".
Disturbing.
The Uluru statement was falsely signed by elders that never even signed it and the other half didn't know what they signed. Anyone that stands up to the yes mob gets verbally or physically assaulted like Jancida Price's grandmother, I've seen all the removed social media posts.
Australians have every bit to be alarmed at passing a referendum that they don't understand the full consequences of.
Numerous signatories of the Uluru Statement from the Heart were ‘surprised’ to see their names on the document that calls for an indigenous voice to parliament and ‘unhappy’ to be seen as endorsing the statement. In a trip to Uluru last week, Liberal senator and indigenous woman, Kerrynne Liddle, was told by numerous Central Australian indigenous leaders that the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Voice to parliament that it called for were causing nothing but “trouble”.
.
Your question has nothing to do with the referendum question, apart from raising issues that again are irrelevant and nonsensical.
From the outset Andersons claims are BS as the Voice would sit outside Parliament.
That's interesting 50cm is a weird depth, a fence strainer post goes in deeper than that, so does that mean that fencing contractors will have to employ an aboriginal consultant.
A quick google on the phone brought this up, check it out and see if it fits the bill. No pun intended.
It's exactly what they said it is, everything to do with 'the voice' is still under the scrutiny of the Indigenous affairs minister, even other Indigenous delegates that oppose the Ularu statement will still be heard by the indigenous affairs minister, and their voice will hold just as much weight as any representative of the Ularu statement, and Linda Burney said this herself.
Treaty will come.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
