- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,300
- Reactions
- 17,536
Opals are found in the ground and people who mine them also tend to live underground.I hear there might be cheap units at the Opal Tower
Yes, even Joe Hockey had a few plans he would have used if he had of served under another Prime Minister.Someone has to reverse it, or at least slow it, especially over East. Otherwise the building industry will fall on its rear end. Then we will see some unemployment.
Just my opinion.
Notwithstanding an ideological chasm (which exists in every party) in what way is this party right wing?The party has moved right, or at least more in line with the U.S. conservatives. It will take many years or a split imo sptrawler. It has happened before. That was when Menzies ended up starting the Liberal Party.
Notwithstanding an ideological chasm (which exists in every party) in what way is this party right wing?
I'm not an economist so please don't be too hard on me. But following on from SR's post I have long wondered if rather than giving tax cuts to business or individuals that probable don't really need it a good way to stimulate the economy would be too give more money to old age pensioners. Perhaps not those on part pensions but those on full pensions. If they were to get more money they wouldn't save it for their next overseas jaunt but spend it all perhaps on the grandkids or buying food or replacing the old fridge or washer. Just a thought.
The other school of thought is give people a tax cut, this improves peoples spending power, which in turn leads to more gst and more jobs as the businesses expand to accommodate more turnover.
I'm not an economist so please don't be too hard on me. But following on from SR's post I have long wondered if rather than giving tax cuts to business or individuals that probable don't really need it a good way to stimulate the economy would be too give more money to old age pensioners. Perhaps not those on part pensions but those on full pensions. If they were to get more money they wouldn't save it for their next overseas jaunt but spend it all perhaps on the grandkids or buying food or replacing the old fridge or washer. Just a thought.
With a progressive tax system, if you give a tax cut to the bottom scale, of course those on higher tax scales get it. How else can it work?If the tax cuts are targeted at the top end of the scale it manages to bypass the lower working class/middle class sections as well.
That ideology I would call corporatist, rather than right. Right wing ideology is more individualistThey value big business more than the individual. They had to be dragged kicking and screaming into holding a banking royal commission and they would rather give tax cuts to businesses instead of individuals.
I think the politicians super has been reigned in, from the ridiculous situation that existed, only the long term ones still qualify for the old system.How about reigning in politicians perks like their super.
I usually get the peanuts and monkeys spiel and think we already have the monkeys running the place.
If the pension is too generous more people will be drawn to it so it'll break the budget.I'm not an economist so please don't be too hard on me. But following on from SR's post I have long wondered if rather than giving tax cuts to business or individuals that probable don't really need it a good way to stimulate the economy would be too give more money to old age pensioners. Perhaps not those on part pensions but those on full pensions. If they were to get more money they wouldn't save it for their next overseas jaunt but spend it all perhaps on the grandkids or buying food or replacing the old fridge or washer. Just a thought.
If the pension is too generous more people will be drawn to it so it'll break the budget.
That will then force Govts to raise taxes or increase the pension age and/or preservation age.
Tax cuts to small business is paramount IMO - otherwise wages will be attacked permanently.
I think the politicians super has been reigned in, from the ridiculous situation that existed, only the long term ones still qualify for the old system.
No doubt what replaced it, is probably still a hell of a lot better, than what us plebs get.
You are spot on, the pension for a married couple is about $35,500 + cheap medicine+ cheap council rates+cheap utilities+cheap vehicle licensing+ cheap government charges.If the pension is too generous more people will be drawn to it so it'll break the budget.
That will then force Govts to raise taxes or increase the pension age and/or preservation age.
Tax cuts to small business is paramount IMO - otherwise wages will be attacked permanently.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?