This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The ScoMo Government

Jump to new
And then this

"The request itself is obscene. It is the kind of tinpot thinking you might expect in a failing dictatorship, maybe for a show trial after the coup. The attorney-general, Michaelia Cash, wishes to introduce evidence in the prosecution of Bernard Collaery that could not be known to Collaery or his lawyers and would instead be assessed by a special counsel engaged by the Commonwealth. It would form the secret basis for a secret trial, the premise of which has already been rejected by a court."

Standover law

The request itself is obscene. It is the kind of tinpot thinking you might expect in a failing dictatorship, maybe for a show trial after the coup. The attorney-general, Michaelia Cash, wishes to introduce evidence in the prosecution of Bernard Collaery that could not be known to Collaery or his...
www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au
 
And not a peep from the tyranny crowd on here ....you know the ones!
 
Humid said:
And not a peep from the tyranny crowd on here ....you know the ones!
Click to expand...


It actually dose my head in, people screaming the sky is falling over COVID restrictions blah blah blah, but this is real a person has already been tried, convicted and sentenced in secret by a conservative government... then this, mean while crickets.
 
I actually hadn't heard anything about it, until your post, it is really amazing that it isn't all over the media.
Even reading your post, it is hard to understand the background story to it, so to comment on it is difficult.
With regard the covid blah, blah, blah, I guess that is because it has been the main topic on everyone's lips, including the media, for the last two years.
Hopefully the media, can bring everyone up to speed, on this issue you have brought up.
One would think the media will be all onto it, as they seem to be keen to find anything to hammer the Government with.
 
Humid said:
And not a peep from the tyranny crowd on here ....you know the ones!
Click to expand...

What are you going to do about it?
Vote Labor?

In seriousness most have said scomo is a pos.
 
Not much protest either about all those wrongly convicted by RoboCop, sorry RoboDebt, many of whom committed suicide.
 
Most right leaners on her won't vote Liberals. However perhaps people are mad that they won't vote labor either?

scomo has consistently showed he was a dodgy character.
I'm not supporting a bunch of dcks:
Pushing for a war with China.
Stomping on people's rights.
Disappear during crises.
And the list of grievances goes on.

Point is that I haven't seen much in the way of support. So who are you guys talking at?
 


For the sake of Australian democracy a federal ICAC is urgently needed, that wont come from the Coalition due to their corruption.

Labor will get one up if only to bury the Coalition who seriously need a good clean out just like WA and BTW the sky hasn't fallen in WA due to a Labor government.

The jumping at shadows at the thought of a federal Labor government has risen to the extreme (EV's will steal your weekend) all the time watching the current mob being possibly the most expensive, corrupt, morally bankrupt, overseeing the largest transfer of tax payers money to (overseas) profitable companies ever on and on.

All this supported by Hanson silence and Palmer's bank account.

Voting for Labor will get an ICAC voting for anyone else is a vote for the Coalition and another term of Morrison (who I am expecting to get re-elected) god help us.
 
I don't disagree with your idea, but are you really trying to say corruption and dishonesty only dwells on one side of politics, I mean really?
 
Humid said:
How do you read that from that statement.....get off the cooking sherry pops
Click to expand...
I'm more a Makers Mark 46, than a cooking sherry man.

By the way if you read what I said, it was a question not a statement, I wasn't judging I was asking.
Which would probably have been recognised by the literate, as there was a question mark at the end. ?
I really do think you should leave the humour to me.
 
Humid said:
Vote for a party who implements an ICAC....like in NSW Glads fanboy
Click to expand...
Throw a few more obeids into the mix you reckon, to even it out. His lapdog kk is in the Senate already isn't she?
Didn't her son recently get involved in some scandal?
 
I'm sorry. Labor would be a terrible idea unless the moderates have actual control. Looking at their front bench looks like the same rejects from rudd/Gillard.

Let's talk about how the ports are currently fking the country's supply of goods for real world effects. Then be honest with the who and why it would get worse under Labor. Labor has plenty going on.

In saying that Liberals are just as sht. But yeah, can punch Labor till they lose a few of their front bench.
 
moXJO said:
Throw a few more obeids into the mix you reckon, to even it out. His lapdog kk is in the Senate already isn't she?
Didn't her son recently get involved in some scandal?
Click to expand...
She will cost Labor the election I reckon... her and Penny Wong.
 
PZ99 said:
She will cost Labor the election I reckon... her and Penny Wong.
Click to expand...
I'm just looking forward to hearing something from Labor, it will be great when the campaigning starts and some of the policies can be discussed, that goes for both sides.
At the moment, there is a lot of waffle but not much on the way of policies, from anybody.
 
Literate...?the statement was from IFocus you clown
 
sptrawler said:
I don't disagree with your idea, but are you really trying to say corruption and dishonesty only dwells on one side of politics, I mean really?
Click to expand...

Corruption runs on both sides that's why you need an ICAC, Labor have a real incentive to install a strong one Coalition have already shown its never going to happen under them due to their recent history imagine what would come out of the Murray–Darling Basin Authority dealings.
 
Humid said:
Literate...?the statement was from IFocus you clown
Click to expand...
Re read your whole post #2972, including my quote, which you posted.
Then think about the fact, I can either make a statement to his quote which then doesn't require an answer, or I can ask a question of his quote which usually is asking for an answer, it has to be one or the other.
I said I was asking a question of the IFocus quote, I wasn't making a statement to his quote, Jeez learn English you muppet.
I was asking him for his reasoning, which he kindly did in #2979.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Bill Shorten: High Flying Fake Or The Worker's Friend
Replies
5
Views
2K
Investoradam
J Capital Research
Replies
1
Views
2K
greggles
R
The 7 Moats of Quality Companies
Replies
7
Views
7K
divs4ever
M
The Night of the Long Prawn
Replies
0
Views
3K
Michael Cornips
M
R
Multiple Sclerosis: If you know of any MS patients
Replies
4
Views
6K
noirua
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...