- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,585
- Reactions
- 7,464
Check out U.S. Navy's latest Destroyer U.S.S. Zumwalt: 182m long, with stealh capabilities so she looks like a small fishing boat on radar
Interesting to note that the famed "Boomer" submarines seem to be being phased out and the use of Nuclear reactors on Submarines makes their stealth abilities problematic, making our deisel tubs handy little things @sptrawler
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Zumwalt
So... lots of fishing boats will better be careful lest they get blown out of the water?
Its a pity they cant afford projectiles for the advanced guns on this thing. It still has plenty of missile fire power though. Maybe they will pull the guns out and fit something else eventually.Check out U.S. Navy's latest Destroyer U.S.S. Zumwalt: 182m long, with stealh capabilities so she looks like a small fishing boat on radar
Interesting to note that the famed "Boomer" submarines seem to be being phased out and the use of Nuclear reactors on Submarines makes their stealth abilities problematic, making our deisel tubs handy little things @sptrawler
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Zumwalt
Not sure there would be enough for a thread nor am I interested Bas. The article quotes research statistics, that is why it landed in the science thread. I could get into a discussion about statins their efficasy/side effects/over prescriptions/dodgy science but then I would be harangued as a 'statin denier' added to that it holds no interest for me, there is little or nothing further for me to learn. I am over bloody doctors and pharmaceutical drugs I learned years ago from the close professional contact I had with doctors as a medical detailer, never ever to take anything they suggest other than for an immediate short term remedy. They are rewarded for their product support in greater and lesser degrees by the pharmaceutical companies.Great find Ann. Agree with you about being unsure where to drop it. Maybe a thread about the role of Big Pharma ?
I wasn't having a go at Bas about being called a 'statin denier' it is a real term and they are adopting the same tactics as is proving so succesful for the GW political lobby. Create fear and confusion, fear alone will make people compliant. Check out the link....statin denier?
You mean like showing a whole country like scotland having the same frequency of heart arest before and after the use of statins decreases cholesterol levels
To put oil on the fire, cholesterol is to heart attack what CO2 is to global earming, a consequence.
A healthy body has low choresterol and also..(not so)..low heart issues
Interesting article in your link.
Nevertheless mentioned that between 70 and 250 people have to take statins for life to no use for one who will benefit.and maybe as a side effect which could be gained with aspirin for example.
My position on statins was confurmed by the abc catalyst report which was aired a while back.i can not access abc sites as i am in china now nor can i google but if anyone is interested, it is worthwhile watching
Hope it help,reduce stress and blood pressure,be active eat healthy and tgat will be much better fir you than popping a statin daily.
Not easier and less money for pharmas i know
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?