This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Science Thread

Jump to new

He's an excellent communicator in all strands of science. The best I've seen.
 

I am not able to view that particular documentary without setting up an account and downloading a specific app.

Are you able to give a summation of the case presented for the dark energy hypothesis?

If it's similar to the basis for belief in dark matter, then it most certainly contains at least one critical flaw.
 
You learn something new every day. Interesting video on the square root of 2 and how it relates to the A series of paper sizes (A4 etc.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:




 

Probably good for the CZZ share price (very nice packaging), but honey is just straight sugar so... you know, you can get those prebiotics in low-sugar yoghurts if you like that sort of thing?
 
Gringotts Bank said:
you know, you can get those prebiotics in low-sugar yoghurts if you like that sort of thing?
Click to expand...

I think you are talking about probiotics. eg the actual bacteria

A prebiotic is what allows the probiotics to grow and multiply, it sets up the favourable conditions in the gut for the good bacteria, sugar is not just sugar and honeys aren't just honey, different types of honey have different benefits.

probiotic - a microorganism introduced into the body for its beneficial qualities

Prebiotic - a non-digestible food ingredient that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the intestines.


different honeys contain different molecules of sugar, and other elements are different between honeys also, flavour, colours etc are different, but not just that, the are lots of other differences, that make honey from different sources active in other ways.
 
OCD cure in under 20 minutes - one symptom, anyway. Very cool. Howie had/has an extreme, chronic case, apparently. I've just been reading up about him online.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
IBM’s Watson gives proper diagnosis for Japanese leukemia patient after doctors were stumped for months

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/ibm-watson-proper-diagnosis-doctors-stumped-article-1.2741857

My comment....

What I find fascinating, even scary, about trends in AI is that it will soon reach a point where machines understanding of things (medicine, science whatever) will start increasing at not just an exponential rate, but an explosive rate.

Let's take this scenario. We have two scientists that are renowned in two different areas of science. Perhaps chemistry and evolutionary biology. Both are experts in their own fields, but likely only have the knowledge of an intelligent layperson in the field of the other. Although projects can bring people from different disciplines together to work on common problems, it may be that one person who has expertise in diverse disciplines is able to gain an insight into problems that a group of people with the same overall body of knowledge cannot (perhaps due to personal rivalries, communication skills etc.). If our two renowned scientists were tasked with acquiring the same expertise in the other scientist's discipline as they have in their own, it would probably not be possible, particularly if achieving that skill level required a lifetime of study and practice.

Now we have two robots that each have been fed the knowledge of those two disciplines (one each) as Watson has on medicine. I am looking a few years into the future with this scenario. The robots may have equivalent skills in their area of expertise as the respective renowned scientists had. But for one of the robots to acquire the expertise of the other may simply be a trivial communications task of perhaps downloading a few gigabytes of code. And that doesn't just apply to two disciplines. It could apply to all bodies of knowledge, the only constraints being memory capacity and processing capability which are increasing exponentially annually (Moore's Law where it still holds).

And where you may have only a dozen or so scientists that have similar knowledge levels of our two scientists in their areas of discipline, you could create thousands of robots with the multi-discipline advanced knowledge.

I would think that this capability is probably less than 10 years away and its potential for good and bad is likely beyond our comprehension, but hopefully not beyond our control, which would be very scary indeed.
 
bellenuit said:
I would think that this capability is probably less than 10 years away and its potential for good and bad is likely beyond our comprehension, but hopefully not beyond our control, which would be very scary indeed.
Click to expand...

As long as we have control over the power switch.
 
Very interesting article in The Guardian on a computer program that analyses the data in scientific papers and then flags errors, or possibly deliberate fraud. Well worth a read.
The long read
The hi-tech war on science fraud
The problem of fake data may go far deeper than scientists admit. Now a team of researchers has a controversial plan to root out the perpetrators

by Stephen Buranyi


Wednesday 1 February 2017 17.00 AEDT

748 Shares
342 Comments

One morning last summer, a German psychologist named Mathias Kauff woke up to find that he had been reprimanded by a robot. In an email, a computer program named Statcheck informed him that a 2013 paper he had published on multiculturalism and prejudice appeared to contain a number of incorrect calculations – which the program had catalogued and then posted on the internet for anyone to see. The problems turned out to be minor – just a few rounding errors – but the experience left Kauff feeling rattled. “At first I was a bit frightened,” he said. “I felt a bit exposed.”

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/01/high-tech-war-on-science
 
I love these multiple choice questions where an algo does its best to trick you but actually gives you the answer...

Q:What do the letters DNA stand for?

If we look at the frequecy of word fragments in the multiple choice:

oxy (2)
ribo (2)
nucleic (3)
acid (2)

too ez!

6/10 - Cool I passed yr10
 
8/10 - muffed greenhouse effect and El Nino
I feel embarrassed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
The 'plan'
Replies
5
Views
2K
ducati916
R
First, Kill Your Ideas
Replies
2
Views
1K
finicky
R
Best Books I Read Last Year
Replies
18
Views
4K
MDWake
R
21 Lessons in Investing
Replies
6
Views
3K
divs4ever
The White House is sinking into a den of iniquity
Replies
3
Views
2K
Tisme
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...