The fundamental error here is to mistake the adaptive behaviours of a new generation for the cause behind labour market changes.
The casualisation rate across the Australian workforce currently runs at around 25 per cent, a fair leap from 18.9 per cent in 1988. Actually, 40 per cent of the work force is termed ‘non permanent’ by the ABS, including contractors and freelancers, many of which if they aren’t called ‘casuals’ might as well be.
I think it is even worse than that. While the ABS might be able to pick up casualisation, it does not pick up on short permanent positions. Many of the jobs that used to be 'whole career' or 'lifetime' jobs are now re-advertised annually or based on a small number of years. They are measured by superficial productivity parameters that do not take into account depth of workplace knowledge or social cohesion in the workplace. Even the public service no longer provides that security.
Instant productivity and growth assessments are achieving exactly the opposite.
As usual me me me me.
You cannot have a job without a business offering you one. They are much likelier to do that if they have flexibility. And there's more likely to be more jobs with a strong business/economy - which also requires flexibility.
And there's more likely to be more jobs with a strong business/economy - which also requires flexibility.
How did the economy survive and grow 30 - 50 years ago without as much flexibility when couples were able to live one one full time wage earner?
How did the economy survive and grow 30 - 50 years ago without as much flexibility when couples were able to live one one full time wage earner?
No GST
No Big Government that takes from everybody and gives to consultants and spin doctors
No gizmos and must-have gadgets that waste money and time to "stay in touch"
Not as much competition for living space
No credit cards
The general attitude was "I would like ... that costs ... so I save until I can afford to buy ... or compromise and settle for ... that costs so much less, so I can afford it now."
And more pride in one's work and achievement without the sense of entitlement to "have it all NOW!".
How did the economy survive and grow 30 - 50 years ago without as much flexibility when couples were able to live one one full time wage earner?
Interesting anecdotal evidence today.
A friend of mine had a months worth of leave coming up, she informed her employer about 4 months ago, but they never officially approved it. Yesterday they told her she could no longer take it as someone else had leave booked at the time. She suggested they hire a temp for that month but the employer wouldn't budge, so she quit and they have to pay out her leave anyway.
They said they were really disappointed that she was leaving and that she is a great worker (which she is), yet even in her exit interview they refused to offer her the leave. Just shows how inflexible to demands employers can be, as she has worked for 18 months without taking any leave. Also shows how employers fail to build trust and respect with their younger employees
I haven't replied before today because a lot of the comments have left me speechless.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?