- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
Part of Krudd's 50,000 new jobs announced at the conference was to train 4,000 house insulators. You could train a monkey in five minutes to do what these guys do.
Why all the vitriol directed towards the Government? I
Why all the vitriol directed towards the Government? .
Because they didnt really THINK about the implications of both the handouts and the infrastructure spending.
But my point was that the focus of our animosity should be towards the people ripping us off.
But my point was that the focus of our animosity should be towards the people ripping us off. If governments only did things that couldn't be abused, then not much would be done.
Just repeating my hope that you will dob these rats in to Fair Trading, Calliope.
Because it is "the Government" that is so free and loose with the taxpayers' money and with so few safeguards, that is encouraging corruption. The rorters and bottom feeders are now in a feeding frenzy. The sad thing is that the majority don't see a problem.
I am failing to see your logic.
would you prefer that these people(insulators) were unemployed and the government paid them a benefit instead?
would you prefer that the government spent it on the likes of upgrading their computers and renovating their offices or other various numb nut ideas etc?
If a job is created , that money will eventually return the full circle through spending and taxing ,so what's your problem?
I am failing to see your logic.
If a job is created , that money will eventually return the full circle through spending and taxing ,so what's your problem?
An installer I was speaking to said that to be eligible to become an approved installer you have to have already been in the business and be qualified (what ever that takes) prior to the grant coming in as to keep out the unscrupulous persons who try to take advantage.
the issue here is the theft from the public purse by unscrupulous tradesmen.
I am failing to see your logic.
would you prefer that these people(insulators) were unemployed and the government paid them a benefit instead?
would you prefer that the government spent it on the likes of upgrading their computers and renovating their offices or other various numb nut ideas etc?
If a job is created , that money will eventually return the full circle through spending and taxing ,so what's your problem?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?