- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,583
- Reactions
- 7,461
I haven't looked into them but I think there'd be rather a lot of people happy to vote for an "old" Liberal Party.Came across this fledging "New Liberals" Party
Whether anyone agreed with the detail of their ideas or not, at least they had serious, intelligent people in charge and there was an explainable logic behind their thinking back then.
¿Qué?Turnbull was the closet we got to that position, but he was thrown out by the Neanderthals.
¿Qué?
Turnbull would always have been more at home in Labor.. nothing remotely like Menzies.
Yeah but modern Labour bears no resemblance to Chifley either.Don't know about that Wayne.
Menzies and Chifley got on pretty well I believe.
They had more points in common than differences imo.
In what way are they different ?Yeah but modern Labour bears no resemblance to Chifley either.
In those days, the ALP was not the party for inner the city woke or corporate interests. Like the Liberal Party, they have foresaken their base constituency.In what way are they different ?
I haven't looked into them but I think there'd be rather a lot of people happy to vote for an "old" Liberal Party.
The party using that name today is nothing like the one Menzies intended indeed it's nothing like the one which existed 30 years ago.
Whether anyone agreed with the detail of their ideas or not, at least they had serious, intelligent people in charge and there was an explainable logic behind their thinking back then.
It's a pretty big mix. I like a lot of it and agree it's "adventurous". Would any of it ever get off the ground without being watered down(senate) to it being pointless though?Have to say I'm surprised there has been little comment on the "new Liberals" policies. (Moxjo did note he had checked it out ) They are very adventurous/forward thinking IMV.
As has happened to a degree in W.A, McGowan isn't cow towing to the union factions and appears to be W.A focused rather than factional issue focused.The problem with any of the new or minor parties is that they do not get much light of day in the media, reinforcing the status quo as an ipso facto establishment two party state.
It would be no less difficult and probably far more successful to try to change the established parties from within
Are you sure a 'job guarantee scheme' is what the unemployed want?Have to say it's a very courageous set of policies. Makes Labour and The Greens look like wimps.
For starters check out Job Guarantee program.
Register for our Job Guarantee Scheme
Find out more
The problem with any of the new or minor parties is that they do not get much light of day in the media, reinforcing the status quo as an ipso facto establishment two party state.
It would be no less difficult and probably far more successful to try to change the established parties from within
Are you sure a 'job guarantee scheme' is what the unemployed want?
I'm sure a lot want a job. But I grew up in an area that was high unemployment and those guys are still on the dole to this day (30+ years). Some people don't want to work or join the system for multiple reasons.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?