IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,670
- Reactions
- 4,761
IFocus, I really can't believe you are silly enough to quote this idiotic rhetoric from Ms gillard!
What on earth is the basis for such a stupid comment. Pauline Hanson has been a non-event for years now, has made zero public commentary (thank god) and has only now poked up her head because she smells the chance of making a few more taxpayer dollars by standing for the Senate.
This is the sort of utter rubbish that so diminishes the Prime Minister. If she were to confine her rhetoric to factually based comments, she would have somewhat more credibility.
Oh for god's sake, Tony Abbott has said over and over that Work Choices is dead.
Just accept that. Do not falsely imply otherwise in an attempt to scare voters.
Just pathetic on her part and a sign of her desperation.
And if you are quoting this nonsense on the basis that you either believe or endorse the Prime Minister's comments, IFocus, then it says more about you than it does about the opposition.
[
Where's Wayne Swan ?Interesting the coalition members who didn't turn up to the nutter rally today and it had nothing to do with LW RW politics.
Where's Wayne Swan ?
Accept what Abbott's says..............climate change is crap, climate change is man made, climate change is real, hang on climate change science is not settled, scripted comments vers non scripted, I didn't fund the attack on Pauline Hanson, budget figures audited by an independent accountant firm.
Accept what Abbott's says..... never ever
BTW if you do or others do that's fine, it would be crass of me to be sitting on a high horse preaching how silly you might be after all its just politics its not real and its not really that serious talking about politicians who couldn't get a real job.
Interesting the coalition members who didn't turn up to the nutter rally today and it had nothing to do with LW RW politics.
Nobody, but nobody with half a brain believes in Global Warming, and I've had that from the high honchos in both the ALP and Coalition Parties.
It's only the Greens and lipservers who push this crazy agenda.
gg
You might be right there, with Bob Brown stirring the pot.Cooking the books........
Ferguson calls Greens basket-weavers and labels leader 'soapbox' Bob
I suspect Labor and the Greens have allready agreed on Labor's RSPT behind closed doors and that this is just a distraction, unless the Greens truely have delusions of taking over Labor as one of two major parties.
They might have in general terms but unlikely in detail neither side would trust the other an inch as they are both looking at similar voter base for the policy and both will want to claim it was them that got it up
Labor should go back to the polls and seek a majority madate for it's policies. If nothing else, they would hopefully rid the PM's office of the Greens.
Labor doesn't have to go back to the polls they will likely get their policy's across the line with the current minority government.
The detail on the mining tax would now be pretty well settled, at least in the context of negotiation between Labor and the Greens.They might have in general terms but unlikely in detail neither side would trust the other an inch as they are both looking at similar voter base for the policy and both will want to claim it was them that got it up.
If they do, Labor will have it's mining tax and the Greens their carbon tax. The Greens will be even happier if the latter is over Labor's corpse.Labor doesn't have to go back to the polls they will likely get their policy's across the line with the current minority government.
If they do, Labor will have it's mining tax and the Greens their carbon tax. The Greens will be even happier if the latter is over Labor's corpse.
???I don't see the carbon tax getting up easily with the Greens.
They did it prior to the election. Bob Brown said there would be a carbon tax introduced this term, at that time, when Labor were denying it.I don't see the carbon tax getting up easily with the Greens. Labor will want it to have no immediately noticable effect or if any to advantage swinging voters in the short term before disadvantaging all. They will want to go to an election lying about Abbott hes a fraud in his claims of it hurting job's, people etc.
Remember the so called tax is only a transition vehicle to some sort of trading scheme same as Kevin Rudd's/Malcolm Turnbull's policy.
Greens don't care because there is only up side no real consequences so they will want it to hurt the consumer who ultimately use the energy/products produced by the bigger carbon produces.
It will be hard to see how both sides can do a deal.
The report was tabled out of session by the government at 10.05pm last night after the NBN debate wrapped up at 10pm.
It was tabled without the knowledge of the committee chairman Chris Back and several other of the Liberal members, including opposition BER spokesman Brett Mason.
"It is very strange indeed that it would be tabled like this . . . it certainly raises suspicions," Senator Mason said late last night.
THE Gillard government could have avoided its temporary floods levy if it had managed schools stimulus programs better, the federal opposition argues.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?