Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,237
- Reactions
- 8,484
A hybrid is obvious better than a pure ice car, because it is part ev, it's the part of it that is ev that makes it better.No reason you can't use regenerative braking on a ICE or hybrid vehicle to wind up a spring or spin a flywheel or even charge a battery for a power reserve.
Not buying Tesla but GM? I guess you did take Elon's put down to people who don't like losing money funding his dreams.
So yes I agree, the more an Ice car becomes like an ev, the better it is, but pure Evs win out.
Oil / petrel has a long way to fall before it becomes competitive with other energy sources, hence why no one is building oil power plants anymore.To each their own, but to me it's just a matter of economics.
The more ev's there are the higher the demand for electricity and therefore the price of electricity will rise and the price of petrol/diesel will fall so a vehicle that can play off petrol/diesel price against electricity price has more flexibility in reducing the running costs of the vehicle and getting a better deal as a consumer.
But I admire you for taking a punt on the ev. In 20 years they may be dominant but I doubt if I will still be around to see it.
Hell, if petrel really got cheap I could just buy an efficient little petrel generator and charge my car using that, and then leave it at home, with a hybrid you are forced to carry your fuel tank and generator around with you all the time, even when you just want to run it in ev mode.
Well lets face it, it's going to be a long time before there are sufficient charging stations around to conquer 'range fear', especially for people like me in regional areas. OK for those in suburbia perhaps.
You make your choice, but it's not for me at the moment.
You can hire a Tesla now, so why not hire one for a month, drive Sydney/Melbourne/Brisbane and see if it lives up to expectations ?
https://www.eveeh.com.au/
I agree with that.More a psychological issue than a real one when your range is >400kmBut for the 99% of the rest of the year, starting each day with 400km's of charge is more than enough.
For governments of oil importing countries (most), it is a godsend for economic reasons, especially if they can produce their own electricity.
Is it really ?
Do you realise how much money governments rip off motorists in fuel excises ?
How are they going to replace that ?
It seems pretty obvious that governments will have to impose some sort of tax on electric vehicles to raise the cost of a charge equal to the same as a tank of petrol, otherwise they will lose billions in revenue. So where has the price advantage of ev's gone ?
Then renewable energy became the generation darling and things have headed south for us ever since.
Privatisation is the reason things are 'heading south'. Governments thought that energy supply was no longer their problem and dropped the ball.
I think you will find the Federal Governments, over the past couple of decades, penalised State Governments which didn't pursue privatisation.
I'm only going from memory, but I can recall, funds being withheld from States that didn't pursue competition through privatisation.
I'm very sure there has been massive pressure applied.I think you will find the Federal Governments, over the past couple of decades, penalised State Governments which didn't pursue privatisation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?